I do not want a war with Iraq, but if Saddam will not reveal all weapons and get rid of them freely, then war maybe the only way and if so, then so be it. And your little crack about the frontlines is pretty stupid.

[quote="Pfc.Green":43090]The balls in Saddams court he has to disclose EVERYTHING if the inspectors find anything not disclosed then Saddam can kiss his cushing postion of murde...rule goodbye, if he fucks up, well...[/quote:43090]

No, the ball is in Bush's court because he now has a choice to make:

- he spews out more bullshit and proceeds with his war or

- he lets inspectors in to do their "thang"


Make no mistake: Bush doesn't want inspections... he wants war. Sadly for
him, he doesn't have a choice anymore: he either lets the inspectors in or
shows us his true colors (intentions).

[quote="Pfc.Green":30f7b]
I do not want a war with Iraq, but if Saddam will not reveal all weapons and get rid of them freely, then war maybe the only way and if so, then so be it. And your little crack about the frontlines is pretty stupid.[/quote:30f7b]

How's it stupid? I am tired of hearing about peeps talk about taking Saddam out, but I don't see any of them running to join up to take part in it.

We'll I am enlisted in the Navy, and ship out to boot at Great Lakes in Feb. So I guess I'm not one of those "peeps".

Green in the Navy?

You're soooooo gonna get ass-raped. biggrin:

He'll get raped by the MARINES.

And I'm sorry, but BUSH is a fucktard on this one. It's obvious he and his father needed someone to get them numbers, and this is just the way to do it. We find WMD in IRAQ, bush is a hero.

I'll wonder what they'll do if and when there ISNT WMD in IRAQ. What kind of spin will come out of tha.t

hake:

I think if the weapon inspectors come in, Saddam henchmen might try to snipe them...possibility...

If that happened then the entire world would kick saddams ass. Remember Basically everyone supports the UN, and the inspectors represent the UN. If saddam did that there would be no more Iraq left. He wouldn't try something like that.

what's with all the Navy gay jokes?

I'd like to see you say that to a Navy man face to face

"uh, sir, I didn't mean that, I, uh......bye-bye" *runs away before he can be stuffed into a piece of shipboard machinery*

well, its great, i mean at least saddam has a bit of sense, and you notice i mention saddam not Iraq, but either way its not a matter weather we go in, its when...sad to say

[quote="Pfc.Green":f2854]We'll I am enlisted in the Navy, and ship out to boot at Great Lakes in Feb. So I guess I'm not one of those "peeps".[/quote:f2854]

Yeah, you sure will be on the front lines in the Navy. Maybe Saddam will send one of his little rafts at you guys. hake:

Before world war 1, the triple alliance and the triple entente(sp) amassed two great opposing armies with the idea that noone would want to enter war because the results would be devasting to both sides because the forces were so big.
That plan was crap because it didnt work.

In world war 2 we saw what 1 A bomb could do in seconds.
since then we have seen tests of nuclear bombs that are more powerful.

The new threat of nuclear weapons as opposed to massive armies works very well.
Saddam probably has some, but i very much doubt he would use them, the fact he has the capability to scare the most powerful country in the world probably gives him a bonor, or something to a similar effect.
Bush doesnt seem to like the fact that anyone can have a nuclear weapon other than him, but picks bones at Saddam because well........he really is a "bad guy". so you cant blame bush for that.
Saddam knows fine well he would lose another gulf war - hes not THAT insane.
Countries who have weapons of mass destruction have them to prevent a mass destruction war. Noone has anything to gain from an apocalypse, and as such, wont ever use them in anger other than a threat.

Well its obvious If one US solider steps on Saddam's soil his gonna pull the trigger and we will all end up with small poxes and anthrax.