i heard its like a fucking vaccum cleaner, but like nvidia said, they promised to make it quiter... we shall see, erm, more like i will ;)

my little GF3 TI500 is quiet as a mouse, and pushes the power of a GF4 4200 biggrin:

i got a gf3 too, i think its one of them mx's though.. thats why i need a new card, heh.

and my dad gets better fps than me and he has a 32mb gf2 oOo:

[quote="Bazooka_Joe":ef184][img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card2.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card1.jpg[/img]

[img]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/images/fx-card3.jpg[/img]

Here's the hardware specs compared to a GF4 and a RADEON 9700:

[url="http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030127/geforce_fx-03.html"]http://www17.tomshardware.com/graphic/2 ... fx-03.html[/url]



This was from Tom's Hardware Guide, his conclusion on the card:

[quote:ef184]NVIDIA takes the crown! No question about it - the GeForceFX 5800 Ultra is faster than the competition from ATI's Radeon 9700 PRO in the majority of the benchmarks. However, its lead is only slight, especially compared to the distance that ATI put between its Radeon 9700 PRO and the Ti 4600. Still, when compared to its predecessor, the GeForce4 Ti, the FX represents a giant step forward. [/quote:ef184][/quote:ef184]


that thing is a joke!

Ermm, what's QuadroFX? I've never heard of it...Is it Matrox or something?

No its basically a geforce fx with a different bios or some shit to make it more functional for 3d programs like lightwave 3ds max etc.

Crap! The hot-linking kicked in. Well, just visit that webpage then.

that thing is a joke![/quote]

what do you mean, its all real.

Oh, I see.