It is that god danm celery for a proccesor you have. Celerons are complete and utter garbage. You ram and video card are good. It is just that lame ass processor holding yo back. They arent nick named celery for a reason.

another thing is delet your entire computer (forget what it called something like formating or something) i did that and gainded about 30 fps on average with me geforce 4

Will, give me a reason I should believe you? Remember you Linux desktop? I dunno how you managed that with Win XP.....

- type into the console COM_maxfps "600" should give you some results.
- if not satisfied format and type in the same thing in the console.
- If you are still not satisfied upgrade the POS Celery(Celeron) in your comp.

Try typing set com-maxfps 999 that helps me swordfight: bigzooka:

com_maxfps 0 sets your fps to infinite

i turned norefresh off and got 1,200 fps, but with that off it draws no polys so its a black screen..

I have a 2.4ghx P4
1 gig of DDR Ram
Geforce 4, 4200 - 64mb.
Game resolutions on 1024 x 768, everything else on max.

Average FPS = 90 - 120.

Um....no. Maybe on stock maps (and even then probably not), but not all custom maps are as efficient (makes me laugh to say effecient and MOH inthe same sentence). Bridges is definately a resource hog. I drop into the 20s and 30s in parts of it with a system that is 2X-3X the one you listed.

this is the problem yet again.... I have no difficulty running other similar games like RTCW and SF2 maxed out with no lag at all but with Mohaa it just absolutly kills me if im not in an enclosed room.. I guess it must be the design of the levels in the game ... meh thnx for yur help

MOH is a notorious resource hog. Bad code or something. I could play RTCW on a amd 400Mhz. I had to upgrade to a 733 to play MOH and then to a 2.2 AND a new vid card to get max performance.

[quote=".sh1fty.":93998]Buy a better PC.[/quote:93998]
Throw your 95 into the bin and go and buy an xp if you can afford one ed: