[quote:9103a]"They are occupiers, and this is their punishment," truck driver Hisham Abed said Monday of the soldiers. "The Americans make nothing but empty promises. There's no electricity, no gasoline and no work." [/quote:9103a]

idiot towell heads, we cant do that to ALL of iraq in 2 months.... hake:

ok let me get this strait...

[quote:9103a]"This is normal. If someone is killed his family has to take revenge," said Abed, the truck driver.[/quote:9103a]
[quote:9103a]A few accounts said the soldiers' throats were cut — either by the attackers or by the mob. The official said Iraqis robbed the car they were driving and stole personal effects from the soldiers' bodies.
. Witnesses said that an Iraqi mob, most of them teenagers, dragged the two bloodied soldiers from the car, threw them to the ground and pummeled their bodies with concrete blocks[/quote:9103a]

tell me, how is that normal.... eek:

we shouldnt have helped them if this is how we get repayed....

[quote="Cpl. Eames":c98df][quote="Sgt Stryker":c98df][quote="Cpl. Eames":c98df]Fucking towel head savages, that whole towns population needs to be rounded up and shot in the back of the head nazi style after we burn there shit hole town down, the life of one american and british soldier is worth the lives of the entire muslim population on earth.[/quote:c98df]

If you love genocide so much, start with yourself and do us all a favor.

BTW. I agree that our lives are more important, that's why we should have stayed home and leave the Iraqis to Saddam, its obvious they deserve each other.[/quote:c98df]

Who said anything about genocide??? I was talking about reprisals against rebels, and its to late to say we shouldnt have gone to war, because whats done is done and we should support our president and the military to finish what they started.[/quote:c98df]


Did hitler level towns the same way ?

Didn't the romans, the mongols, and every other offensive army in history that had to occupy hostile enemy territory resort to reprisals to disuade partisan activity??! Since we didn't wage a total war against Iraq and dont have the numbers to effictivly police and occupy the entire country only through the use of informants, colaborators, reprisals, and other fear tactics can u disuade the enemy from partisan activity.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":6e5c5]Didn't the romans, the mongols, and every other offensive army in history that had to occupy hostile enemy territory resort to reprisals to disuade partisan activity??! Since we didn't wage a total war against Iraq and dont have the numbers to effictivly police and occupy the entire country only through the use of informants, colaborators, reprisals, and other fear tactics can u disuade the enemy from partisan activity.[/quote:6e5c5]

The mongols also ate horses and didn't use forks,
I think we're a little more civilized... well most of us are anyways
The mongols and romans didn't claim to have the moral high ground either, they just invaded and took what they wanted. I'd like to think that my country is not a criminal agressor like the mongols but a liberator and peacekeeper.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":a6933]Fucking towel head savages, that whole towns population needs to be rounded up and shot in the back of the head nazi style after we burn there shit hole town down, the life of one american and british soldier is worth the lives of the entire muslim population on earth.[/quote:a6933]

if i was out there u ignorant piece if shit american, and u were out there too, i would tear ur body up too if u died. i love to see ppl like u get killed.

[quote="Sgt Stryker":b0f58][quote="Cpl. Eames":b0f58]Didn't the romans, the mongols, and every other offensive army in history that had to occupy hostile enemy territory resort to reprisals to disuade partisan activity??! Since we didn't wage a total war against Iraq and dont have the numbers to effictivly police and occupy the entire country only through the use of informants, colaborators, reprisals, and other fear tactics can u disuade the enemy from partisan activity.[/quote:b0f58]

The mongols also ate horses and didn't use forks,
I think we're a little more civilized... well most of us are anyways
The mongols and romans didn't claim to have the moral high ground either, they just invaded and took what they wanted. I'd like to think that my country is not a criminal agressor like the mongols but a liberator and peacekeeper.[/quote:b0f58]

I would like to think this too, and if we were fighting a ligatimate army from a legitamate nation in a conventional battle scenerio then I would be the first to champion following the rules of war to the fullest, but when your facing an enemy who has no regard for anything, doesnt wear a uniform, is made up from people from all over the mideast who are fighting for some sick jihadist organization that encourages vicious attacks against anyone they disagree with and whose mission is to inflict as much casualties on us as they can, disregarding their own lives then the only way to disuade further attacks and prevent the loss of more of our troops lives is to become harsher and crack down on these bastards instead of apearing weak and taking no serious retalitory actions against them...when your dealing with savages, the only thing they will respond to is more savagry...

[quote="[2ss]Panzer":b29d4][quote="Cpl. Eames":b29d4]Fucking towel head savages, that whole towns population needs to be rounded up and shot in the back of the head nazi style after we burn there shit hole town down, the life of one american and british soldier is worth the lives of the entire muslim population on earth.[/quote:b29d4]

if i was out there u ignorant piece if shit american, and u were out there too, i would tear ur body up too if u died. i love to see ppl like u get killed.[/quote:b29d4]

ya...when i get to the mideast and if u happend to be there you would have to wait for me to be dead before you could tear up my body because if i was alive and i heard you speaking your anti american bs, I would beat you to a bloody pulp, then after i was done beating you, i'd let everyone from the platoon beat your ass, you fucking hipee...canada would be with us in iraq if it wasnt for cowards like you, and the fact that you have a fucking frenchman leading your country.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":89bb1][quote="[2ss]Panzer":89bb1][quote="Cpl. Eames":89bb1]Fucking towel head savages, that whole towns population needs to be rounded up and shot in the back of the head nazi style after we burn there shit hole town down, the life of one american and british soldier is worth the lives of the entire muslim population on earth.[/quote:89bb1]

if i was out there u ignorant piece if shit american, and u were out there too, i would tear ur body up too if u died. i love to see ppl like u get killed.[/quote:89bb1]

ya...when i get to the mideast and if u happend to be there you would have to wait for me to be dead before you could tear up my body because if i was alive and i heard you speaking your anti american bs, I would beat you to a bloody pulp, then after i was done beating you, i'd let everyone from the platoon beat your ass, you fucking hipee...canada would be with us in iraq if it wasnt for cowards like you, and the fact that you have a fucking frenchman leading your country.[/quote:89bb1]

why would Canada fight Iraq?
they're smart enough not to fall for the phantom WMD line we got hooked on. Face it, Saddam didn't even have too many tanks, not to mention WMDs or missiles that could reach the US.

[quote="Sgt Stryker":377d1][quote="Cpl. Eames":377d1][quote="[2ss]Panzer":377d1][quote="Cpl. Eames":377d1]Fucking towel head savages, that whole towns population needs to be rounded up and shot in the back of the head nazi style after we burn there shit hole town down, the life of one american and british soldier is worth the lives of the entire muslim population on earth.[/quote:377d1]

if i was out there u ignorant piece if shit american, and u were out there too, i would tear ur body up too if u died. i love to see ppl like u get killed.[/quote:377d1]

ya...when i get to the mideast and if u happend to be there you would have to wait for me to be dead before you could tear up my body because if i was alive and i heard you speaking your anti american bs, I would beat you to a bloody pulp, then after i was done beating you, i'd let everyone from the platoon beat your ass, you fucking hipee...canada would be with us in iraq if it wasnt for cowards like you, and the fact that you have a fucking frenchman leading your country.[/quote:377d1]

why would Canada fight Iraq?
they're smart enough not to fall for the phantom WMD line we got hooked on. Face it, Saddam didn't even have too many tanks, not to mention WMDs or missiles that could reach the US.[/quote:377d1]

it wasnt about iraqs ability to directly attack the us, but it was about the possiblity of him supplying wmds to a terrorist organization like al-queda who might use them in attacks, and canada should be with us in iraq...not only is canada america jr...but as a common wealth of great britian they should feel like its there duty to go and defend the interest of britian like faithful ol australia, who has been with us in all of our conflicts since ww2, by our sides and fighting with american troops...i guess when the cards are down we know who are real friends are....only england and austrailia...when it used to be the entire common wealth, the french and germans were never trustworthy to begin with.

its kind of hard to give Al Quaeda weapons that one does not have, we still have not found any there.
Also if we wanted to put the hurt on Al Quaeda we should have pressured Saudi Arabia, however we can't do that because the Saudi king and certain members of US government are buddy-buddy

You stupid fucks, you guys are dumber then a box of rocks. The point is: Saddam was in the process of creating WMD, and if he did he would of most certaintly gave them to terroists. Then what would the terroists do?? Fucking land one in one of our bays back home. Then that'd wipe out half of our country east or west coast and then people would blame President Bush for not taking action against Saddam or the Terroists a few years back.

It's called being "prepared" you ignorant bastards. We're not going to sit around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for the next terroist attack. I'm just glad 9/11 was just two planes hitting two buildings... not two nukes taking out both of our coasts.

[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":dd123]You stupid fucks, you guys are dumber then a box of rocks. The point is: Saddam was in the process of creating WMD, and if he did he would of most certaintly gave them to terroists. Then what would the terroists do?? Fucking land one in one of our bays back home. Then that'd wipe out half of our country east or west coast and then people would blame President Bush for not taking action against Saddam or the Terroists a few years back.

It's called being "prepared" you ignorant bastards. We're not going to sit around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for the next terroist attack. I'm just glad 9/11 was just two planes hitting two buildings... not two nukes taking out both of our coasts.[/quote:dd123]

you should get your head out of your afterburner groundpounder!
they didn't have the ability to make replacement parts for Soviet era tanks, most of their intact armor was broken down.
You don't expect them to build a nuke or chemical weapons if they can't fix a goddamn tank!

[quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":524e2]You stupid fucks, you guys are dumber then a box of rocks. The point is: Saddam was in the process of creating WMD, and if he did he would of most certaintly gave them to terroists. Then what would the terroists do?? Fucking land one in one of our bays back home. Then that'd wipe out half of our country east or west coast and then people would blame President Bush for not taking action against Saddam or the Terroists a few years back.

It's called being "prepared" you ignorant bastards. We're not going to sit around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for the next terroist attack. I'm just glad 9/11 was just two planes hitting two buildings... not two nukes taking out both of our coasts.[/quote:524e2]

Agree with you completly...SEMPER FI

[quote="Sgt Stryker":47f9b][quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":47f9b]You stupid fucks, you guys are dumber then a box of rocks. The point is: Saddam was in the process of creating WMD, and if he did he would of most certaintly gave them to terroists. Then what would the terroists do?? Fucking land one in one of our bays back home. Then that'd wipe out half of our country east or west coast and then people would blame President Bush for not taking action against Saddam or the Terroists a few years back.

It's called being "prepared" you ignorant bastards. We're not going to sit around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for the next terroist attack. I'm just glad 9/11 was just two planes hitting two buildings... not two nukes taking out both of our coasts.[/quote:47f9b]

you should get your head out of your afterburner groundpounder!
they didn't have the ability to make replacement parts for Soviet era tanks, most of their intact armor was broken down.
You don't expect them to build a nuke or chemical weapons if they can't fix a goddamn tank![/quote:47f9b]

The real fact of the matter is that its a well known fact that sadam has had in his possesion wmd's and has used them before....if sadam didnt have wmd why wouldnt he let the un inspectors in?? Why did he keep delaying allowing them to come into iraq?? Maybe so he can hide them in some bunker in the middle of the dessert, or send them to another country...or better yet even sell them off?? If he wasnt hiding something why would he not allow the weapon inspectors in?? We went after him because he didnt comply, which by un law should have resulted in the security council taking action against iraq, but wait france and germany didnt want that...they didnt want to end their lucrative buisness ties to sadam, and what happend to nato? I thought when one nato country went to war the others were automaticly suposed to come to their aid...where are our nato allies with the exception of the uk and its common wealth (excluding canada) when we need them now in iraq? They are screwing us over forgeting all we have done for them in the past, the fucking ingrates...after we liberated the fucking cowaradly french and occupied western germany...under the marshall plan we payed for the rebuilding of western europe, and how are they repaying us now??!!! After 9-11 where 3000 americans died the adminstration took alot of heat for not being prepared and forseeing this attack, we don't play games anymore...as long as we suspect someone of harboring and suporting terrorist then we should attack them because we can't afford to let another 9-11 happen, ever.

[quote="Cpl. Eames":1c5bf][quote="Sgt Stryker":1c5bf][quote="Cpt. Zapotoski":1c5bf]You stupid fucks, you guys are dumber then a box of rocks. The point is: Saddam was in the process of creating WMD, and if he did he would of most certaintly gave them to terroists. Then what would the terroists do?? Fucking land one in one of our bays back home. Then that'd wipe out half of our country east or west coast and then people would blame President Bush for not taking action against Saddam or the Terroists a few years back.

It's called being "prepared" you ignorant bastards. We're not going to sit around with our thumbs up our asses waiting for the next terroist attack. I'm just glad 9/11 was just two planes hitting two buildings... not two nukes taking out both of our coasts.[/quote:1c5bf]

you should get your head out of your afterburner groundpounder!
they didn't have the ability to make replacement parts for Soviet era tanks, most of their intact armor was broken down.
You don't expect them to build a nuke or chemical weapons if they can't fix a goddamn tank![/quote:1c5bf]

The real fact of the matter is that its a well known fact that sadam has had in his possesion wmd's and has used them before....if sadam didnt have wmd why wouldnt he let the un inspectors in?? Why did he keep delaying allowing them to come into iraq?? Maybe so he can hide them in some bunker in the middle of the dessert, or send them to another country...or better yet even sell them off?? If he wasnt hiding something why would he not allow the weapon inspectors in?? We went after him because he didnt comply, which by un law should have resulted in the security council taking action against iraq, but wait france and germany didnt want that...they didnt want to end their lucrative buisness ties to sadam, and what happend to nato? I thought when one nato country went to war the others were automaticly suposed to come to their aid...where are our nato allies with the exception of the uk and its common wealth (excluding canada) when we need them now in iraq? They are screwing us over forgeting all we have done for them in the past, the fucking ingrates...after we liberated the fucking cowaradly french and occupied western germany...under the marshall plan we payed for the rebuilding of western europe, and how are they repaying us now??!!! After 9-11 where 3000 americans died the adminstration took alot of heat for not being prepared and forseeing this attack, we don't play games anymore...as long as we suspect someone of harboring and suporting terrorist then we should attack them because we can't afford to let another 9-11 happen, ever.[/quote:1c5bf]
He did let the inspectors in. Remmeber they were called out before the invasion? NATO is used for defense not offense. When one NATO country is attacked all of them declare war on that country. Not when one attacks a country. Why didn't NATO countries fight in Vietman then, if you think that? Dude, Al-Qaeda is no linked to Saddam. Saddam is a secular leader, while Bin Laden is fundementalist. Here's a hint... they tried to kill Saddam. You know, if Al-Qaeda would have had weapons of mass destruction it was highly likely that they would actually use them against Saddam. Why would Saddam give them weapons then brainiac?! Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..........