<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>They need to learn the difference between panzershreik and panzerfaust.
I love to see germans smoking cigarettes near an ammo cache.,, miniature stuka divebombers.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Dude the Panzerfaust was a 1 use gun only! U fire it ur done. In the game they have a panzer shreck. Yes i would also like to see soem jU-87 STUKA DIVE BOMBERS COME IN AND STRAFE US AND BLOW OUR TANKS UP. but EA wanted it to be "fun" for the little kids. I think it be cool on D-day if 2 109's came down and streaffed some troops!



------------------
http://dba.gamepoint.net/images/luftwaffe.jpg

Time for me to chime in.

It's pointless making posts like this. Medal of Honor was not and is not supposed to be a realistic, squad-based simulation. It's an adventure with a lot of over-the-top action and thrilling environments, set in the interesting era of WWII. Op-Flash is a hard core military simulation (well, the infantry part anyway.. the tank/air sim part is laughable) that was first and foremost totally realistic (you usually die in one, SOMETIMES 2 shots)

They are both GOOD games. It all depends on your opinion and what kind of importance you place on realism. This is like comparing apples to oranges, folks. I happen to like both games for what they are. I appreciate the time Bohemia Interactive took to get things realistic in OFP; I appreciate the time 2015 took to make everything look and feel authentic and exciting.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Tahoma, Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Oberleutnant Durham:
No you just wish you had enough time to learn what I have about history. If they hired a military advisor then how come I know more than he does.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


No, idiot. The game is NOT supposed to be realistic. It is supposed to be a combination of realistic AND arcade. Your complaints are stupid, it is the arcade part of the game.

Also, for you to say 'how come I know more about that guy(their advisor, Dale Dye)' shows your LACK of knowledge on military history. If you knew much about it, then you would know who Dale Dye is.

hey durham..d/l Day of Defeat

People the game has been released, why do these threads keep showing up? As I've said before If you have that many problems with the game simply don't play it. I think it is the most realistic WWII game out there (haven't played WWII online so I don't know about that one), and is it or is it not fun to play?

If you can't answer that it's fun then move on to a more realistic game. All out realism can be fun but I believe that in a game like this it would be much too frustrating.

/end rant http://www.alliedassault.com/ubb/biggrin.gif

------------------
http://dba.gamepoint.net/images/pvtr...averobber1.jpg
"It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practice either of them." - Mark Twain

WW2 online sucks.... Why do I need to know who dale dye is. oh and about the panzer thing... they're firing a panzerfaust round out of a panzershreik

It's pointless making posts like this. Medal of Honor was not and is not supposed to be a realistic, squad-based simulation. It's an adventure with a lot of over-the-top action and thrilling environments, set in the interesting era of WWII. Op-Flash is a hard core military simulation (well, the infantry part anyway.. the tank/air sim part is laughable) that was first and foremost totally realistic (you usually die in one, SOMETIMES 2 shots.

Or 3 4 or 5 depending where you are hit, the flying in Operation flash point sucks yeah, but the other sim aspects are flawless. beautiful gameplay, a solid plot, FUN AND ACCURACY IN REALISM. I actually have to have a minute of angle on the sniper rifle in flashpoint.. I LOVE IT. Codemasters are awesome! they KNOW when a product is ready for shipping