[quote="Grim_Reaper":72635][quote=GenBlackJackal]you are an idiot. i found the pic somewhere, and cropped it and worked from there. i never even claimed it was a render, let alone making it, smartass. oOo:
and hawke, it's just got a rail system instead of rear sight/handle.[/quote:72635]
i never said you did or didnt claim it. im saying most of it isnt your work, the m4 looks very very fake if its not a render.[/quote:72635]
i dont care what the hell it is, it's a picture! i dont give a f*** if it's a render, or sorta unrealistic looking. And, all of it is my work. the pic i found, the rest, I made.

don't piss on the fire

[quote=GenBlackJackal][quote="Grim_Reaper":50ad1]i never said you did or didnt claim it. im saying most of it isnt your work, the m4 looks very very fake if its not a render.[/quote:50ad1]
i dont care what the hell it is, it's a picture! i dont give a fuck if it's a render, or sorta unrealistic looking. And, all of it is my work. the pic i found, the rest, I made.[/quote:50ad1]
then its not your work, its you and the photographers work

Looks like a Colt XM177E1 to me. I mean, look at the little thing just above and to the front of the trigger. That doesnt exist on the M4-series as far as I know, only in the XM/CAR-series. Kind of like this:

[img]http://world.guns.ru/assault/commando.jpg[/img]


(Note: Thats a Colt Commando, but its an 'offspring', or w/e, from the XM/CAR-type rifle)

yea, i know, trendy. but i wanted a try.
[img]http://img14.exs.cx/img14/5451/red25.jpg[/img]

[img]http://img14.exs.cx/img14/821/trendy.jpg[/img]

Awful

[quote="Scalping Chief":32797][/quote:32797]

[quote="Apocalypse | NoW":120be][quote="Scalping Chief":120be][/quote:120be][/quote:120be]

My diarreah looks better than that.

Re: m4a1
 

i like +1

i acually like them

[quote=GenBlackJackal][quote="Grim_Reaper":e3830]i never said you did or didnt claim it. im saying most of it isnt your work, the m4 looks very very fake if its not a render.[/quote:e3830]
i dont care what the hell it is, it's a picture! i dont give a f*** if it's a render, or sorta unrealistic looking. And, all of it is my work. the pic i found, the rest, I made.[/quote:e3830]
tsk tsk tsk! no cussing! seriously, i just dont like the sig. make a new one.

[quote="Apocalypse | NoW":9f7ff][quote="Scalping Chief":9f7ff][/quote:9f7ff][/quote:9f7ff]

[quote="Grim_Reaper":6bc69][quote=GenBlackJackal][quote="Grim_Reaper":6bc69]i never said you did or didnt claim it. im saying most of it isnt your work, the m4 looks very very fake if its not a render.[/quote:6bc69]
i dont care what the hell it is, it's a picture! i dont give a f*** if it's a render, or sorta unrealistic looking. And, all of it is my work. the pic i found, the rest, I made.[/quote:6bc69]
tsk tsk tsk! no cussing! seriously, i just dont like the sig. make a new one.[/quote:6bc69]

I don't he really cares that you just don't like his sig, he was just trying to get some constructive comments, not for someone to go on about the source pic not being made by the maker of the sig. Who cares?

What percent of sigs around here are 100% original? Thats the point of source pics.

No, He didn't make the picture of the gun, but he put it into an artful piece. You want to stress the importance of originality in sigmaking? Then I would like to see you hand draw your text, or make your own fonts... You can't say its truly original if you didn't make everything, right? Thats just plain nonsense.

BTW, I like the sig a lot, Jackal. There is just one thing that caught my attention, and somebody already said it, the transparent stripe would probably look better behing the gun and ammo. Try it that way and see what you think.

I like the animated ground force think in the bottom left. Nice touch.


::Pinches himself constantly to avoid using explicitives...::