Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Xbox 2 (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=38092)

Madmartagen 07-04-2004 04:05 PM

[quote="Maj.}{awke":9fefa]
Quote:

Originally Posted by maple
plus you have to buy games for console

Not if you have Alchol 120[/quote:9fefa]

rock:

alcohol 120% + Modified PS2 + Modified Xbox = 1337ness

Pyro 07-04-2004 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
I'd prefer originality in games that come on console than the redundant tiresome FPS games that flood the PC.

Such as repetative snorefests like final fantasy 1 to final fantasy part 33 entitled :yup we're milking the fuck outta this. oOo: eek:

final Fantasy VI > anything on PC ever made.

Which would of course explain why fps are a shitload more popular than snore p g's right? yup thought so, oOo:

I think FFX had what...2.1 million pre orders in Japan alone? I think more people own FF7 than almost all PC games, especially the FPS games. You live ont he computer so you don't realize how many people play RPGS and they are more popular.

Machette 07-04-2004 05:25 PM

wtf oOo:

Mr.Buttocks 07-04-2004 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machette
wtf oOo:


Pyro 07-04-2004 05:26 PM

We can't base video game states on north america alone. Once you leave this continent, barely anyone plays westernized games.

geRV 07-04-2004 05:27 PM

[quote=Pyro]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":bd9b6
I'd prefer originality in games that come on console than the redundant tiresome FPS games that flood the PC.

Such as repetative snorefests like final fantasy 1 to final fantasy part 33 entitled :yup we're milking the fuck outta this. oOo: eek:

final Fantasy VI > anything on PC ever made.

Which would of course explain why fps are a shitload more popular than snore p g's right? yup thought so, oOo:

I think FFX had what...2.1 million pre orders in Japan alone? I think more people own FF7 than almost all PC games, especially the FPS games. You live ont he computer so you don't realize how many people play RPGS and they are more popular.[/quote:bd9b6]

Probably cause the japanese are freaks for rpg's, rest of the world is more into first person shooters. As for 2.1 million preorders n japan, big deal, most pokemon games get that anytime theyre about to be released in japan.

Machette 07-04-2004 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
We can't base video game states on north america alone. Once you leave this continent, barely anyone plays westernized games.

pyro wtf are you rambling on about now ffs eek:

Pyro 07-04-2004 05:29 PM

[quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":b435e
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":b435e
I'd prefer originality in games that come on console than the redundant tiresome FPS games that flood the PC.

Such as repetative snorefests like final fantasy 1 to final fantasy part 33 entitled :yup we're milking the fuck outta this. oOo: eek:

final Fantasy VI > anything on PC ever made.

Which would of course explain why fps are a shitload more popular than snore p g's right? yup thought so, oOo:

I think FFX had what...2.1 million pre orders in Japan alone? I think more people own FF7 than almost all PC games, especially the FPS games. You live ont he computer so you don't realize how many people play RPGS and they are more popular.[/quote:b435e]

Probably cause the japanese are freaks for rpg's, rest of the world is more into first person shooters. As for 2.1 million preorders n japan, big deal, most pokemon games get that anytime theyre about to be released in japan.[/quote:b435e]

We were discussing popularity. And Pokemon does not outsell the FF series.

Machette 07-04-2004 05:30 PM

nag: plzdie:

Mr.Buttocks 07-04-2004 05:31 PM

Has anyone got the correct time on them?

geRV 07-04-2004 05:31 PM

[quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":c22cf
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":c22cf
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":c22cf
I'd prefer originality in games that come on console than the redundant tiresome FPS games that flood the PC.

Such as repetative snorefests like final fantasy 1 to final fantasy part 33 entitled :yup we're milking the fuck outta this. oOo: eek:

final Fantasy VI > anything on PC ever made.

Which would of course explain why fps are a shitload more popular than snore p g's right? yup thought so, oOo:

I think FFX had what...2.1 million pre orders in Japan alone? I think more people own FF7 than almost all PC games, especially the FPS games. You live ont he computer so you don't realize how many people play RPGS and they are more popular.[/quote:c22cf]

Probably cause the japanese are freaks for rpg's, rest of the world is more into first person shooters. As for 2.1 million preorders n japan, big deal, most pokemon games get that anytime theyre about to be released in japan.[/quote:c22cf]

We were discussing popularity. And Pokemon does not outsell the FF series.[/quote:c22cf]

First you talk about preorders then you talk about popularity, pokemon in japan is easily as popular as final snoredom. As for westernised games, its pretty much a fact that first person shooters are played more than basically any other style of game online.

Pyro 07-04-2004 05:35 PM

[quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":0c850
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":0c850
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":0c850
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":0c850
I'd prefer originality in games that come on console than the redundant tiresome FPS games that flood the PC.

Such as repetative snorefests like final fantasy 1 to final fantasy part 33 entitled :yup we're milking the fuck outta this. oOo: eek:

final Fantasy VI > anything on PC ever made.

Which would of course explain why fps are a shitload more popular than snore p g's right? yup thought so, oOo:

I think FFX had what...2.1 million pre orders in Japan alone? I think more people own FF7 than almost all PC games, especially the FPS games. You live ont he computer so you don't realize how many people play RPGS and they are more popular.[/quote:0c850]

Probably cause the japanese are freaks for rpg's, rest of the world is more into first person shooters. As for 2.1 million preorders n japan, big deal, most pokemon games get that anytime theyre about to be released in japan.[/quote:0c850]

We were discussing popularity. And Pokemon does not outsell the FF series.[/quote:0c850]

First you talk about preorders then you talk about popularity, pokemon in japan is easily as popular as final snoredom. As for westernised games, its pretty much a fact that first person shooters are played more than basically any other style of game online.[/quote:0c850]

So people who say Soccer is better and more popular because it is played world wide more are wrong if they use that as argument to defend the sport. In terms of popularity, world wide. RPGs are the most popular games. Hell gamefaqs.com did their best game ever poll and rpgs came in like the top 5.

Machette 07-04-2004 05:40 PM

pyro please stfu rock:

geRV 07-04-2004 05:40 PM

Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

Pyro 07-04-2004 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. These people are willing to pay monthy fees to play the game...would you do that for shit like COD? I bet not. Try again.

geRV 07-04-2004 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

Machette 07-04-2004 05:51 PM

happy:

Pyro 07-04-2004 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Mr.Buttocks 07-04-2004 06:00 PM

Bored.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.

Pyro 07-04-2004 06:03 PM

[quote=Gerard]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":d1a97
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.[/quote:d1a97]

HL and CS suck though. To take time to do everything there is to do in an RPG would take into the hundreds of hours.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:05 PM

[quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":a2e4b
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":a2e4b
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.[/quote:a2e4b]

HL and CS suck though. To take time to do everything there is to do in an RPG would take into the hundreds of hours.[/quote:a2e4b]

IN "your" opinion, cs isn't the most played fps game there is for no reason. Hundreds of hours of gameplay? Cs has been around 4 years and is still owning even newer fps games in terms of popularity, hundres of hours in an rpg you say> Try 4 years worth in cs.

Pyro 07-04-2004 06:10 PM

[quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":dd7fc
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":dd7fc
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":dd7fc
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.[/quote:dd7fc]

HL and CS suck though. To take time to do everything there is to do in an RPG would take into the hundreds of hours.[/quote:dd7fc]

IN "your" opinion, cs isn't the most played fps game there is for no reason. Hundreds of hours of gameplay? Cs has been around 4 years and is still owning even newer fps games in terms of popularity, hundres of hours in an rpg you say> Try 4 years worth in cs.[/quote:dd7fc]

So what...it won't stand the test of time like Super Mario of NES, RPGS on the sNES and so on. We won't be playing CS in 10 years but hell we still play super mario 20 years after it came out.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:13 PM

[quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":7f67e
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":7f67e
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":7f67e
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":7f67e
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.[/quote:7f67e]

HL and CS suck though. To take time to do everything there is to do in an RPG would take into the hundreds of hours.[/quote:7f67e]

IN "your" opinion, cs isn't the most played fps game there is for no reason. Hundreds of hours of gameplay? Cs has been around 4 years and is still owning even newer fps games in terms of popularity, hundres of hours in an rpg you say> Try 4 years worth in cs.[/quote:7f67e]

So what...it won't stand the test of time like Super Mario of NES, RPGS on the sNES and so on. We won't be playing CS in 10 years but hell we still play super mario 20 years after it came out.[/quote:7f67e]

Its been around 4 years already on an engine thats based on the quake 1 engine, cs is now going to the source engine so id say its pretty safe bet cs will still being played for quite some time yet.

Pyro 07-04-2004 06:18 PM

[quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro][quote=Gerard][quote=Pyro][quote="Gerard":45a5d]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":45a5d
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":45a5d
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":45a5d
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":45a5d
Because 1 website does a poll that automatically speaks for gamers around the globe? Umm no.

Rpgs may be popular but as far as online gaming goes fps > rpg, end of story.

This was never about online gaming though. So you are basically saying overall RPGs are WAY more popular (and better) and FPS are just played more online.

I'm sure Everquest ins't a popular RPG played online, i'm sure no one has ever played that game. Try again.

wtf do you mean never about online gaming, fps games are practically MADE for online gaming, they have sp yeah but the real draw is the multiplayer aspect. Everquest online, big friggin deal, one popualr online rpg game in the middle of a shitload of popular fps games. oOo:

As far as pay for play, its for morons, gg rpg online community. oOo:

We aren't talking about what these games were made for. Just because it is online doens't make it more popular. The fact that it needs multiplayer to be even considered ok is pathetic. These american developers seems to have no idea how to make single player enjoyable.

Sorry shawn but you;re wrong, multiplayer adds a LOT to the lonjevity of a game, online even more so, games life can be extended by years, halflife and counterstrike are perfect examples of this. Would you rather a fps game came with sp and no multiplayer? Answer: no you wouldn't ,if you say other wise its bs. Singleplayer cod was enjoyable, singleplayer mohaa was enjoyable, most of the good rated fps gams have had enjoyable single player modes. But as always multiplayer is the lasting appeal, because its a different experiance nearly anytime you play, then factor in mods to the equation and we can see what kind of game has the real lasting appeal and why theyre popular.[/quote:45a5d]

HL and CS suck though. To take time to do everything there is to do in an RPG would take into the hundreds of hours.[/quote:45a5d]

IN "your" opinion, cs isn't the most played fps game there is for no reason. Hundreds of hours of gameplay? Cs has been around 4 years and is still owning even newer fps games in terms of popularity, hundres of hours in an rpg you say> Try 4 years worth in cs.[/quote:45a5d]

So what...it won't stand the test of time like Super Mario of NES, RPGS on the sNES and so on. We won't be playing CS in 10 years but hell we still play super mario 20 years after it came out.[/quote:45a5d]

Its been around 4 years already on an engine thats based on the quake 1 engine, cs is now going to the source engine so id say its pretty safe bet cs will still being played for quite some time yet.[/quote:45a5d]

CS and CS 2 are different games. People won't play CS when newer games based ont he same come on. Super Mario has had countless sequels and #1 will still be played. Online FPS are all the same and boring and just have a notch up in graphics to change it.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:22 PM

Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Pyro 07-04-2004 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Who cares? It still sucks and is full of hackers. That;s why people like Buckweed like these games.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Who cares? It still sucks and is full of hackers. That;s why people like Buckweed like these games.

Possibly hence the reason for the new engine to eliminate said hackers?

Pyro 07-04-2004 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Who cares? It still sucks and is full of hackers. That;s why people like Buckweed like these games.

Possibly hence the reason for the new engine to eliminate said hackers?

Hackers evolve as the engines evolve.

geRV 07-04-2004 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Who cares? It still sucks and is full of hackers. That;s why people like Buckweed like these games.

Possibly hence the reason for the new engine to eliminate said hackers?

Hackers evolve as the engines evolve.

Anticheats evolve as the cheats evolve...

Pyro 07-04-2004 07:01 PM

[quote=Gerard]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerard
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Gerard":307c7
Cs: source is NOT repeat NOT counterstike 2, its the same game with some physics and updated skins and bug fixes. COunterstrike 2 is further down the line.

Who cares? It still sucks and is full of hackers. That;s why people like Buckweed like these games.

Possibly hence the reason for the new engine to eliminate said hackers?

Hackers evolve as the engines evolve.

Anticheats evolve as the cheats evolve...[/quote:307c7]

anti-anticheats evolve as the anticheats evolve...

Pick Axe 07-04-2004 09:42 PM

FFS why the fuck are yall arguing which is better rpgs or fps?? They are different, period. You might as well be comparing Darts and pool. Different people play them, though some play both. Neither's better than the other, their different, ffs.

That said, I like rpg's, but not japanese anime ones. I like ones like Morrowind and KOTOR. But, I also play fps, like Halo, MOH whatever.

Pyro 07-04-2004 10:31 PM

[quote="Pick Axe":15e02]FFS why the fuck are yall arguing which is better rpgs or fps?? They are different, period. You might as well be comparing Darts and pool. Different people play them, though some play both. Neither's better than the other, their different, ffs.

That said, I like rpg's, but not japanese anime ones. I like ones like Morrowind and KOTOR. But, I also play fps, like Halo, MOH whatever.[/quote:15e02]

Kingdom Hearts is like those and made by a japaneese company (if you can get past the disney theme) and just as good. It is probably the most fun PS2 game there is.

Pyro 07-04-2004 10:45 PM

Kass - We'd Look Hot As A Couple, Cause Your Shaped So Beautifly And Your ALMOST As Cute As Me says:
omg i hate guyz
Shawn - I won’t let this happen to my children, meet the real world coming out of your shell, I will rise up. says:
sorry
Kass - We'd Look Hot As A Couple, Cause Your Shaped So Beautifly And Your ALMOST As Cute As Me says:
no not you
Kass - We'd Look Hot As A Couple, Cause Your Shaped So Beautifly And Your ALMOST As Cute As Me says:
your probably the only one i dont hate

Pyro 07-04-2004 11:29 PM

*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
fine eat my clit
Shawn - I won’t let this happen to my children, meet the real world coming out of your shell, I will rise up. says:
wow, adam you work pretty fucking fast
pretty turtles Chelsea says:
lol
Shawn - I won’t let this happen to my children, meet the real world coming out of your shell, I will rise up. says:
it took you a week to get down her pants and all
*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
ye geeeze im such a slut
*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
only a week
pretty turtles Chelsea says:
not even that

Fireal 07-04-2004 11:52 PM

eek:

Machette 07-04-2004 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
fine eat my clit
Shawn - I won’t let this happen to my children, meet the real world coming out of your shell, I will rise up. says:
wow, adam you work pretty fucking fast
pretty turtles Chelsea says:
lol
Shawn - I won’t let this happen to my children, meet the real world coming out of your shell, I will rise up. says:
it took you a week to get down her pants and all
*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
ye geeeze im such a slut
*[. .Chelsea. .]* I Love you Adam says:
only a week
pretty turtles Chelsea says:
not even that


oOo:

strvs 07-05-2004 12:03 AM

stfu

Machette 07-05-2004 12:06 AM

sleeping:

guarnere 07-05-2004 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machette
sleeping:



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.