![]() |
Yeah America fucks up more on average than most others
|
this guy hates Russia and America, YOU MUST BE A FUCKING NAZI.
Pfc. Green, would you be kind enough to help me throw this guy out. |
Canada seems like a nice place, england too.
|
getting back to the original topic (despite some people's best efforts to start in a flame war with me)
Why does Yemen need SCUDs? a SCUD is a medium to short range ballistic missile, which means it has rather poor accuracy (better than V-2, and early US/Soviet attempts, but still crappy). It is designed to be tipped with a tactical nuke for use against attacking or defending ground units. Mind you with a nuke it doesn't matter if you miss your mark by half a mile will still kill the guys at the objective. But Yemen has no nukes (as far as we know that is...). same with Iraq. interesting is it not? |
1.The Tiger 2 could destryo just about any tank. but it had major problems....the turret could not traverse fast enough...it was hand cranked....
2.it had narrow tracks causing major problems in the snow. 3.it was very slow and hard to turn and drive I would say in the summer the germans would kill anyone (WW2) In the winter the russian tanks with wide tracks and high speed would win |
[quote="Sgt Stryker":f5c6a]getting back to the original topic (despite some people's best efforts to start in a flame war with me)
[/quote:f5c6a] Errrrmmmmm..... [quote:f5c6a]Why does Yemen need SCUDs?[/quote:f5c6a] Why ask why? [quote:f5c6a]It is designed to be tipped with a tactical nuke for use against attacking or defending ground units. Mind you with a nuke it doesn't matter if you miss your mark by half a mile will still kill the guys at the objective. But Yemen has no nukes (as far as we know that is...)[/quote:f5c6a] I'm sure you can fit some nerve agents in it's payload. |
[quote="-Blitzer-":b6a95]1.The Tiger 2 could destryo just about any tank. but it had major problems....the turret could not traverse fast enough...it was hand cranked....
2.it had narrow tracks causing major problems in the snow. 3.it was very slow and hard to turn and drive I would say in the summer the germans would kill anyone (WW2) In the winter the russian tanks with wide tracks and high speed would win in the winter[/quote:b6a95] I am pretty sure King Tiger had an automatic turret. but yes, most of Jerry's equipment was not too suited for winter operations. |
[quote=Blitz]
Quote:
[quote:cbffb]Why does Yemen need SCUDs?[/quote:cbffb] Why ask why? [quote:cbffb]It is designed to be tipped with a tactical nuke for use against attacking or defending ground units. Mind you with a nuke it doesn't matter if you miss your mark by half a mile will still kill the guys at the objective. But Yemen has no nukes (as far as we know that is...)[/quote:cbffb] I'm sure you can fit some nerve agents in it's payload.[/quote:cbffb] anyone who knows me well enough knows that spreading lies about allied technology and propagating the nazi superiority myth is a surefire way to get me in a flame war. as far as nerve agents, unlikely, the SCUD's warhead section is not too particularly big and could not hold much nerve gas. Considering that nerve gas is active for an extremely short time after release (they are bulky (molecule wise), unstable compounds) it will not be very effective. (remember that SCUD has a +- half mile accuracy) |
Quote:
but even 100, 000 dead Islamic militants is a good step in the global fight against terrorism. I hope Chechneya can return to being civilized soon and your soldiers can go home. |
[quote="Sgt Stryker":79266]
propagating the nazi superiority myth [/quote:79266] Show me the EXACT quote where I made any reference to the "Aryan" race |
[quote=Blitz]
Quote:
well considering that I am right now watching "discovery wings" on digital cable and they just said that the Yak-3 was superior to FW-190s I can only assume that you are spreading myths about Nazi Germany's superiority. |
I hate to re-ignite old flame wars but read em and weep:
(shows how your "superior" King Tigers got their butts whooped first time out on the Russian front) http://www.battlefield.ru/library/battles/battle16.html |
Well no fucking shit moron, most weapons get owned the first time they are used, but in just about all other actions Tiger II's whopped ass. Most of the time airstrikes were needed to take them out. The M-16 wasn't exactly a resounding success in it's first field trials either. As a side note, have you ever heard of the battle of Targul-Frumos?
|
Quote:
The problem with the M-16 was not with the M-16 but with the fact that no cleaning kits were issued, the M-16 worked fine... for a while, until they got gunked up with burned powder residue. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.