The Military supports him? That make hin a good leader? I don't think so.

I wouldn't go for either of them.
Neither had combat experiance, so they only knwo war from movies hake:

and furthermore Bush and company=oil lobby
(and don't say it's not so because Ms. Rice has a tanker named after her at Exxon, they don't just give names away to people they're not connected with)

[quote="Sgt Stryker":dc3af]I wouldn't go for either of them.
Neither had combat experiance, so they only knwo war from movies hake:
[/quote:dc3af]

Presidents dont need combat experiance to be good leaders, just look at Lincoln no combat experiance, and he did pretty damn good.

[quote="Pfc.Green":30cce][quote="Sgt Stryker":30cce]I wouldn't go for either of them.
Neither had combat experiance, so they only knwo war from movies hake:
[/quote:30cce]

Presidents dont need combat experiance to be good leaders, just look at Lincoln no combat experiance, and he did pretty damn good.[/quote:30cce]

I have to agree with you there, Green.. Combat experience has nothing to do with being President. But, I do wonder if a President with combat experience would be more or less likely to use the military for questionable gains, since he would know first hand the reality of war. hmm I'lll have to do a little research this weekend if I have time.