Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   Man Thought He Was Running Over Bin Laden (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=35653)

Eight Ace 03-18-2004 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
He still is the reason life is the way it is in alot of countries and not still absolute monachys.

Yes, he showed how bad those pesky absolute monarchys were...by making himself Emperor of France...err..... eek:

Pyro 03-18-2004 08:33 PM

[quote="Eight Ace":1df65]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
He still is the reason life is the way it is in alot of countries and not still absolute monachys.

Yes, he showed how bad those pesky absolute monarchys were...by making himself Emperor of France...err..... eek:[/quote:1df65]

Which is why it's good he was defeated. My mothers side of the family is from Poland, and when they livd there Napoleon is revered for crushing the former government there.

Eames 03-18-2004 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
You waste too much time. You're just mad Napoleon owned.

and under Louis the XIV, not even most of europe could win one battle vs France.

your an idiot luis xiv did shit except for get france involved in a bunch of wars that they lost and bankrupted france while he was at it.

And like the famous french military history article says, france only owned militarily when they were lead by a non-frenchman...a corsican named napoleon, who was owned by england.

Napoleon has no knowledge of naval warfare. British Naval Supremacy was one of th emajor factors to his loss. He still is the reason life is the way it is in alot of countries and not still absolute monachys.

so...america is suposed to be jealous of napoleon making the polacs happy? Last time I checked we liberated western europe from the nazis. Take your anti american rhetoric else where.

Pyro 03-18-2004 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
You waste too much time. You're just mad Napoleon owned.

and under Louis the XIV, not even most of europe could win one battle vs France.

your an idiot luis xiv did shit except for get france involved in a bunch of wars that they lost and bankrupted france while he was at it.

And like the famous french military history article says, france only owned militarily when they were lead by a non-frenchman...a corsican named napoleon, who was owned by england.

Napoleon has no knowledge of naval warfare. British Naval Supremacy was one of th emajor factors to his loss. He still is the reason life is the way it is in alot of countries and not still absolute monachys.

so...america is suposed to be jealous of napoleon making the polacs happy? Last time I checked we liberated western europe from the nazis. Take your anti american rhetoric else where.

Ya, i'm sure the rest of the allies were of no help to ridding the nazis.

Eames 03-18-2004 09:22 PM

[quote=Pyro]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Quote:

Originally Posted by "Pyro":423c4
You waste too much time. You're just mad Napoleon owned.

and under Louis the XIV, not even most of europe could win one battle vs France.

your an idiot luis xiv did shit except for get france involved in a bunch of wars that they lost and bankrupted france while he was at it.

And like the famous french military history article says, france only owned militarily when they were lead by a non-frenchman...a corsican named napoleon, who was owned by england.

Napoleon has no knowledge of naval warfare. British Naval Supremacy was one of th emajor factors to his loss. He still is the reason life is the way it is in alot of countries and not still absolute monachys.

so...america is suposed to be jealous of napoleon making the polacs happy? Last time I checked we liberated western europe from the nazis. Take your anti american rhetoric else where.

Ya, i'm sure the rest of the allies were of no help to ridding the nazis.[/quote:423c4]

Everyone knows America won both world wars for the allies, don't even try to make that argument. True our allies did fight....just everything they used to fight with was made in the good ol usa.

Pyro 03-18-2004 09:29 PM

Ya i'm sure the millions of sacrifices the russian army made to helping destroying the nazis didn't help at all. Without Russia, the allies would of not won.

Eames 03-18-2004 09:35 PM

Without the united states the russians wouldnt have won...its a simple as that. No one nation had the power to take on germany by themselves.

guarnere 03-18-2004 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Without the united states the russians wouldnt have won...its a simple as that. No one nation had the power to take on germany by themselves.

I try to tell everyone that without help from American during WW2...things would have been a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOT worse... rock:

Pyro 03-18-2004 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eames
Without the united states the russians wouldnt have won...its a simple as that. No one nation had the power to take on germany by themselves.

Everyone knows America won both world wars for the allies

Sure changed your story.

Take russia out of the picture, just say the pact between Germany and Russia never ended. I doubt that Britian, France or America even together could of stood a chance.

snipeymagoo 03-18-2004 09:54 PM

gg pierre

Colonel 03-18-2004 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Take russia out of the picture, just say the pact between Germany and Russia never ended. I doubt that Britian, France or America even together could of stood a chance.

I respectfully disagree Pyro. There is no doubt that having two fronts weakened the Germans but The United States was just getting rolling when the war ended. Germany had built up their military for years before the US entered the war and we had to start from scratch. Would the war have taken longer? Probably. Would the outcome have been different? Never.

Pyro 03-18-2004 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyro
Take russia out of the picture, just say the pact between Germany and Russia never ended. I doubt that Britian, France or America even together could of stood a chance.

I respectfully disagree Pyro. There is no doubt that having two fronts weakened the Germans but The United States was just getting rolling when the war ended. Germany had built up their military for years before the US entered the war and we had to start from scratch. Would the war have taken longer? Probably. Would the outcome have been different? Never.

I still doubt Germany at it's peak wouldn't of crushed any country. America also didn't have many causilities of war coming into the war, Germany had many.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.