ps george bush has cumstained teeth

I'm looking forward to this movie not because I'm some George Bush-hating political whorebag. I find Moore's films entertaining.

No scruffy dude from Michigan is really going to affect the way I view the world...well, maybe Nyck could. And Bane. And Bleu...but that's IT! biggrin:

Scruffy.. rock:

not sure what moore has to say but i think the war on afgan/iraq is crap. America (and canada) got what was coming to them.

i cant wait to see it and i hated Bowling For Columbine. this movie will the must see movie of the summer.
why?

because its something that everyone is intrested in weather you like or hate Michael Moore.

shrek 2 is the must-see movie of the summer biggrin:

me?


Moore is an ass, he has such slanted views it is crazy. He started his crap with GM in Flint and its all been downhill from there. I love how Short and some ( I said SOME) of the other Canadians go off on Bush. You stay on your side of the river and we will stay on our side. I promise not to vote in your elections if you do the same. I think this country is doing fine. My vote is for BUSH!!!!

oOo:

[quote="Sgt>Stackem":64be0]
me?


Moore is an ass, he has such slanted views it is crazy. He started his crap with GM in Flint and its all been downhill from there. I love how Short and some ( I said SOME) of the other Canadians go off on Bush. You stay on your side of the river and we will stay on our side. I promise not to vote in your elections if you do the same. I think this country is doing fine. My vote is for BUSH!!!![/quote:64be0]

I was just racking them up against bush in my post wasnt I ? The only bush comments made were sarcastic ones made after chappy's little comment on Me. The only person who goes off on Bush regularly is Pyro. So your arguement dies deadi n the water there.

To Chappy. Why are you going back to my orginal post ? have you no comment on the validity and arguement I presented to you about John ?

You obviously no horse shit. The only war debatable as Wrong is the Iraq war, though i am for that war. The War on Afghan was totally right. Al Queda attacked us, we had every right to go into Afganistan

actually i did a major presentation in my philosphy class, a 1 hour presentation on the war and the Ethics of it all. I did not take a stance in presenting it, I only presented both sides arguements and at the end of class I told them to decide for themselves. it was a 20 minute power point so it was long. I showed them where the oil exports were going what US companies privatized the Iraqi utility's, showed Saddam's mass graves & how much of a insane person Uday his son was etc. It got to quite a few people so I think it worked. I remained neutral threw out class not taking a side threw it. I decided it was bets for the day.

[quote="Short Hand":67ac9]

-The man who wrote that article, John Fund" is a right extremist. (More fanatical then a Tree Hugger")

-He is a Wife Beater. If you didn't know about that little incident

-This guy is rumored to have multiple affairs. From what I see he is another Right "sided" scum bag.(Not that the left does not have any as well) If you take what he wrote in that article seriously then seriously you are just feeding into his bullshit.

-Never take a 3rd rate columnist's internet postings as anything but biased crap.

[/quote:67ac9]

you didnt deal with the facts in Fund's article but resorted to name calling: right extremist, wife beater, philanderer, right "sided" scum bag, and finally a 3rd rate columnist...absolutely nothing about the facts he presents about Moore's style of filmaking that overlooks facts in order to make his point.

the debate was over when you started the ole mud sling because you resorted to what you so detest: ignoring the issues and start with the name calling...followed by me being clueless because i disagree with you. i respect your opinion but dont feel the need to go to personal attacks to circumvent the point

i still stand by Fund's article in spite of all his inadequecies as a man (Clinton was a man-whore but that didnt seem to sway Democrats and liberals in general to question his judgment)

[quote=Chappy]you didnt deal with the facts in Fund's article but resorted to name calling: right extremist, wife beater, philanderer, right "sided" scum bag, and finally a 3rd rate columnist...absolutely nothing about the facts he presents about Moore's style of filmaking that overlooks facts in order to make his point.

the debate was over when you started the ole mud sling because you resorted to what you so detest: ignoring the issues and start with the name calling...followed by me being clueless because i disagree with you. i respect your opinion but dont feel the need to go to personal attacks to circumvent the point

i still stand by Fund's article in spite of all his inadequecies as a man (Clinton was a man-whore but that didnt seem to sway Democrats and liberals in general to question his judgment)[/quote:9369b]

your calling me mmud slinging when your the one who started this with micheal moore. Its not a mud slinging contest.

+ please tell me why anyone should take Mr Fund seriously the man is a bigger so called joke then moore if you consider him one. He beat his wife had mutiple affairs, is hated by 90 % of major news papers in America. Of course im not going to take his bull seriously just like you take Mr Moore's stuff as bull.


- Did Clinton marry his whore then beat the shit out of her ? Did Moore marry someone then beat the fuck out of her ? No' but MR Fund did.

+ BUSH IS A RETARD OMG ASNNSFKLJFNOSFNLJKN!!!!11 (sarcasm for the slow ones)

[quote="Short Hand":1aaf4]+ BUSH IS A RETARD OMG ASNNSFKLJFNOSFNLJKN!!!!11 (sarcasm for the slow ones)[/quote:1aaf4]

It gets funnier and funnier everytime you say it, shit bag rolleyes:

I could give a shit less what you guys above the boarder think of America, we dont need your help or your opinions, we're the world power not you, we help countries, we overthrow dictators, if youve got a problem with that fine, sound off. Last thing I think about each day is what short an idiotic jizz stain thinks of our president, it's completely irrelevent. It's quite funny how pyro and the other "smart canadian lefties" of the forum say we get into other peoples afairs to much, but what are they doing? They are sticking their noses into our politics. If you believe that a country should mind its own buisness mind your own. Short, words cannot express how big of a leftist annoying cunt you really are. I hope you crash your POS riced out car. OMG 200KM/H? I had that 2.2l rocking. Die.

[quote="Short Hand":eda2d]

your calling me mmud slinging when your the one who started this with micheal moore. Its not a mud slinging contest.

+ please tell me why anyone should take Mr Fund seriously the man is a bigger so called joke then moore if you consider him one. He beat his wife had mutiple affairs, is hated by 90 % of major news papers in America. Of course im not going to take his bull seriously just like you take Mr Moore's stuff as bull.


- Did Clinton marry his whore then beat the shit out of her ? Did Moore marry someone then beat the fuck out of her ? No' but MR Fund did.

+ BUSH IS A RETARD OMG ASNNSFKLJFNOSFNLJKN!!!!11 (sarcasm for the slow ones)[/quote:eda2d]

i didnt start anything because i didnt call moore any kind of names, just that he makes biased hateful movies

and once again you proved my point for me...you didnt deal with any facts, just went back to the name calling. What Clinton did was as bad as you hang around Fund's neck. I don't care what Michael Moore's personal life is like, its not my concern...I dont like his work and I dont agree with his opinions. I dont agree with how his lunatic rants are picked up by mainstream democrats and suddenly become sound bytes that are nothing but mean-spirited.

jumping to infantile remarks and personal attacks is the quickest way to show that you actually have no substance behind all the wind youre throwing at me. You call Fund a right wing lunatic and I call Moore a lunatic in general. why would I respect what Fund writes about? the same reason why you would respect the kind of movies that Moore makes. you are doing the same thing you are accusing me of...putting aside the character traits of moore (you called him a nutbag) in order to see the movie just as i put aside Fund's shortcomings to read what he writes about Moore. same thing