[quote="TGB!":20f0d][quote:20f0d]Its not that hes bad at public speaking, hes fucking retarded and cant speak.[/quote:20f0d]

What does that say about the dumb shits who couldnt beat a "fucking retard" -

[quote:20f0d]Its amazing some people think hes done a good job.[/quote:20f0d]

Too true - all he's done is knock down two oppresive regimes while in control of a rebounding economy and still maintain a decent poverty rate, as well as getting the FED DEFICIT under control -

Who does this fucker think he is?[/quote:20f0d]


there were dozens of other oppressive regimes around the world. why iraq over any of the ones in places like africa?

\MUGABE!!!!

Look, another thread about a video that was geniounely funny has turned into partisan political bullshit. WALKEN 2008!!

That I supose could be swung 2 ways. [or 3 for the douche bags]

Osama Bin Laden was held responsible for 9/11. Osama Bin Laden was believed at the time to be in Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan. Whatever. Sadaam was also believed to partially help him. So why not go there? Sadaam is in Iraq. Osama was possibly in Iraq.

Tried to finish what his father couldn't. [for the special ones]

The other, of course, is oil.

I'm glad he won over Kerry. Kerry said he would have pulled out of Iraq. That's just a Vietnam with fewer casualties. Even though staying in Iraq has caused more death, they are slowly [very slowly] making progress. However I'm not saying he is a good choice, just the better one.

Bush isn't completely a moron. Sure, he appears to be, but you don't just get through a Ivy League school. [Expects "daddy was president"] I think it's better that he speaks to the people and not with big words that 3/4 of Americans can't understand. Which right there is the main problem, the majority of US citizens are too oOo: to know what it is they really are voting for.

/rant

Source?

stupid:

I'm not going to look it up through google or whatever search engine.

I could be wrong, probally am. I just remember hearing something like that coming from Bush. If not true, just ignore that part and read the rest I supose.

Something I forgot to mention as a reason going in before is WMD. However, we all know he was off on that one.

Which is something I find to be oOo: . He says we went in after WMD mainly. But then half way through the war, he says we went in to "save" the Iraqi people. He stressed they had WMD soooo much, but I don't remember him talking much about liberating them...

stupid:

Seriously, if Walken did run, no one would fight over politcs and we could a buttsecks train.

I stil believe there were WMD in Iraq. [Pre-emptive response="Pyri/Short Hand"] "So WHERE ARE THE DMWS Nowz?"
*Cough*Syria*cough*[/Pre-emptive response]

no in they are in your stomach

happy:

short quit hacking my account, its obvious i never type as bad as you cuss:

yea, I thought that sounded a bit dyslexic for you, stat
rolleyes:

everyone stop hacking kthnx calmdown: