Alliedassault

Alliedassault (alliedassault.us/index.php)
-   Offtopic (alliedassault.us/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   More Mac Awesomeness (alliedassault.us/showthread.php?t=49606)

Judas 11-26-2005 01:44 PM

More Mac Awesomeness
 
http://s92915907.onlinehome.us/drag_drop_image.jpg


^ super leet feature of the safari browser. you can drag any image from any page and drop on desktop , folder , etc. btw, in that screen cap, that is me draggin the sig from the page if you cant tell.

[DAS REICH] Blitz 11-26-2005 01:46 PM

Pretty cool, if games didn't come out 2992592 years later for mac, i'd consider buying one

Akuma 11-26-2005 01:46 PM

plzdie:

geRV 11-26-2005 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Akuma
plzdie:


angel:

11-26-2005 01:53 PM

Mac > Windows

too bad games take forever.

Judas 11-26-2005 01:53 PM

you can actually do it from ie as well , but no preview.

geRV 11-26-2005 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Mac > Windows


annoy:

Judas 11-26-2005 01:55 PM

im beginning to think so as well ... windows is nice as a gaming platform, but other wise i think mac os owns it ... ive pretty much been using the mac for everthing - gaming lately.


: if you notice in that screen i have 2 illustrations open and one indesign document, 2 browser windows and a "finder" ( my computer ) window, without a decrease in performance, on a 1.4 ghz machine.

Akuma 11-26-2005 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acideyez
Mac > Windows


annoy:


11-26-2005 02:06 PM

speaking of OSes, i wonder how Linux will do on PS3.

Nyck 11-26-2005 02:38 PM

mac and awesome should never be used in the same sentence.

ps right click save > drag

c312 11-26-2005 02:53 PM

I think that the Mac OS is just more efficient...I've really been looking at getting an iBook just for homework and web browsing and movies then using my PC for gaming. It's just that Macs are soooooo expensive and I don't have anymore money to spare because of school and court related things.

Short Hand 11-26-2005 03:03 PM

The only thing macs are good for is video editing. (rendering basis of 1-1, not 2-+ like pcs... other then that they are useless peices of trash that look trendy.

(and that problem can be solved via video rendering card).

Akuma 11-26-2005 03:11 PM

Dual Opterons beat dual G5s across the board in all multimedia tests.

Macs aren't any faster at video editting or photoshop than a PC of the same price.

Judas 11-26-2005 03:40 PM

dunno about how fast but they are certainly tailored for the multimedia market ... i know most if not all commercial digital art work is done using macs.

Judas 11-26-2005 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nyck
mac and awesome should never be used in the same sentence.

ps right click save > drag

yeah , 3 operations > 1.

Short Hand 11-26-2005 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
dunno about how fast but they are certainly tailored for the multimedia market ... i know most if not all commercial digital art work is done using macs.

(on my campus) Only the video related professor use mac's. Every other person around uses PC's for Illustrator, Photoshop ect.

c312 11-26-2005 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
dunno about how fast but they are certainly tailored for the multimedia market ... i know most if not all commercial digital art work is done using macs.

My friend's mom used to be one of the 5 lead editors at National Geographic as a layout editor. She used a mac and even took a G4 with 20" monitor and Adobe CS Suite when she left the job. I assume that National Geographic would know which computers to use for their work

elstatec 11-26-2005 05:34 PM

judas you are such a fucking mac boon.



its like me making a thread in a forum of 95% mac owners on "More windows awesomeness."

Jin-Roh 11-26-2005 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec
judas you are such a fucking mac boon.



its like me making a thread in a forum of 95% mac owners on "More windows awesomeness."

lets do it. biggrin:

Mr.Buttocks 11-26-2005 06:38 PM

awesome

Judas 11-26-2005 07:15 PM

i hate you all.

Michael 11-26-2005 08:20 PM

no offense to all the mac users/lovers here, but macs aren't all that great. you won't find one mac user who doesn't have at least one adobe product on their machine or one macromedia product. they're basically machines built for designing. thats it. that is its strength. much like how linux is more for like, servers and not all that great for gaming. pc's can do so much more than macs...and pc's won't cost you an arm and a leg like macs do.

[DAS REICH] Blitz 11-26-2005 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
dunno about how fast but they are certainly tailored for the multimedia market ... i know most if not all commercial digital art work is done using macs.

My friend's mom used to be one of the 5 lead editors at National Geographic as a layout editor. She used a mac and even took a G4 with 20" monitor and Adobe CS Suite when she left the job. I assume that National Geographic would know which computers to use for their work

wow, national graphic=god now? oOo:

Michael 11-26-2005 08:31 PM

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":9a628]
Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
dunno about how fast but they are certainly tailored for the multimedia market ... i know most if not all commercial digital art work is done using macs.

My friend's mom used to be one of the 5 lead editors at National Geographic as a layout editor. She used a mac and even took a G4 with 20" monitor and Adobe CS Suite when she left the job. I assume that National Geographic would know which computers to use for their work

wow, national graphic=god now? oOo:[/quote:9a628]oh thats right i forgot, only a mac is capable of using photoshop, illustrator, quark and various video editing programs....right? stupid:

c312 11-27-2005 11:26 AM

No, they aren't god, only one of the longest running and respectable photographic magazines that exists...


I'd say that makes them qualified to establish which types of computers are better for what. They wouldn't waste the money if it wasn't for a reason.

Nyck 11-27-2005 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
No, they aren't god, only one of the longest running and respectable photographic magazines that exists...


I'd say that makes them qualified to establish which types of computers are better for what. They wouldn't waste the money if it wasn't for a reason.

Yes Mac's allow me to see every stretch mark on drooping tribal tits.

Short Hand 11-27-2005 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c312
No, they aren't god, only one of the longest running and respectable photographic magazines that exists...


I'd say that makes them qualified to establish which types of computers are better for what. They wouldn't waste the money if it wasn't for a reason.



Just to let you know, when the g4 luanched, the NEAREST competing pc product out at the time was something in the range of p3 500mhz... your comparision is from a different time. PC's have far exceeded that since then. While macs are forced to run daul cpu systems to play catch up. Your comparision.. let me say this again.. IS COMPLETELY outdated. This coming from a mac user. I would take a mac over a pc anyday when it comes ot video editing, but when it comes to anything else......PC > Mac. (and if I HAD THE MONEY I WOULD TAKE daul opterons over the mac g5 solution, being as daul opterons (880's) can run youinto the 6k range cpu's alone......

geRV 11-27-2005 01:22 PM

The whole reason apple have switched to intel from the motorola power pc chips is because they can't get 3ghz chips working. I believe apple said they would launch a 3ghz pc near 2 years ago and still nothing.

TGB! 11-27-2005 04:30 PM

I think MAC's have created their own self-perpetuating "our machines are best for video-editing" reputation. . .as someone said - you can build a comperable PC and it might actually cost you less. But because MAC's have this image of being hip and non-comformist (used only in the sense that the number of PC users FAR outstrips MAC users) - that art-school students and trendy liberal art majors flock to the machines. The only argument someone has made for MAC's user over a PC is that it is "more secure" - which is a spurious argument, but I rarely bother explaining why its so.

Forte 11-27-2005 04:56 PM

all I care about is that I have had my iBook for 4 years now and it still runs as fast as the day I got it.

elstatec 11-27-2005 05:21 PM

macs are like a industry standard in the design world, most magazines you will see will have been created on a mac in quark or indesign, it just works the best for the job. Plus macs dont go out of date over night unlike pc hardware.


cant wait to get my hands on the new intel powerbooks.


[quote="Short Hand":d6123]
Just to let you know, when the g4 luanched, the NEAREST competing pc product out at the time was something in the range of p3 500mhz... your comparision is from a different time. PC's have far exceeded that since then. While macs are forced to run daul cpu systems to play catch up. Your comparision.. let me say this again.. IS COMPLETELY outdated. This coming from a mac user. I would take a mac over a pc anyday when it comes ot video editing, but when it comes to anything else......PC > Mac. (and if I HAD THE MONEY I WOULD TAKE daul opterons over the mac g5 solution, being as daul opterons (880's) can run youinto the 6k range cpu's alone......[/quote:d6123]

AND FOR FUCK SAKE LEARN ENGLISH FOOL.


oh and what do you think the microsoft xbox360(currently as powerful if not more than alot of pcs) playable demos and shit a few months ago was running on before they got the hardware all sorted out for it? yes apple g5s.
[url="http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+running+on+Macs/2100-1043_3-5706658.html"]http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+runn ... 06658.html[/url]

geRV 11-27-2005 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec

oh and what do you think the microsoft xbox360(currently as powerful if not more than alot of pcs) playable demos and shit a few months ago was running on before they got the hardware all sorted out for it? yes apple g5s.
http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+runn ... 06658.html

Probably cause the xbox 360 has powerpc cpu's inside so obviously the development platform is gonna be mac based. Compared to intel and amd cpu's, powerpc cpu's are a joke.

Akuma 11-27-2005 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV
Quote:

Originally Posted by elstatec

oh and what do you think the microsoft xbox360(currently as powerful if not more than alot of pcs) playable demos and shit a few months ago was running on before they got the hardware all sorted out for it? yes apple g5s.
http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+runn ... 06658.html

Probably cause the xbox 360 has powerpc cpu's inside so obviously the development platform is gonna be mac based. Compared to intel and amd cpu's, powerpc cpu's are a joke.

qft

jujumantb 11-27-2005 06:11 PM

Re: More Mac Awesomeness
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
http://s92915907.onlinehome.us/drag_drop_image.jpg


^ super leet feature of the safari browser. you can drag any image from any page and drop on desktop , folder , etc. btw, in that screen cap, that is me draggin the sig from the page if you cant tell.

this thread is retarded... XP and explorer can drag images onto the desktop and folders too... just without the resource hoarding graphic of the image moving around... rolleyes:

Short Hand 11-27-2005 06:41 PM

[quote=elstatec]macs are like a industry standard in the design world, most magazines you will see will have been created on a mac in quark or indesign, it just works the best for the job. Plus macs dont go out of date over night unlike pc hardware.


cant wait to get my hands on the new intel powerbooks.


[quote="Short Hand":8231f]
Just to let you know, when the g4 luanched, the NEAREST competing pc product out at the time was something in the range of p3 500mhz... your comparision is from a different time. PC's have far exceeded that since then. While macs are forced to run daul cpu systems to play catch up. Your comparision.. let me say this again.. IS COMPLETELY outdated. This coming from a mac user. I would take a mac over a pc anyday when it comes ot video editing, but when it comes to anything else......PC > Mac. (and if I HAD THE MONEY I WOULD TAKE daul opterons over the mac g5 solution, being as daul opterons (880's) can run youinto the 6k range cpu's alone......[/quote]

AND FOR FUCK SAKE LEARN ENGLISH FOOL.


oh and what do you think the microsoft xbox360(currently as powerful if not more than alot of pcs) playable demos and shit a few months ago was running on before they got the hardware all sorted out for it? yes apple g5s.
[url="http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+running+on+Macs/2100-1043_3-5706658.html"]http://news.com.com/Xbox+360+demos+runn ... 06658.html[/url][/quote:8231f]

I love my incomplete and run on sentences... My ill use of comma's and semi collins is also quite sexy.

Machette 11-27-2005 06:56 PM

I still have an ibook hanging around from my private school days.

Mr.Buttocks 11-27-2005 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geRV

Compared to intel and amd cpu's, powerpc cpu's are a joke.


[img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img][img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img][img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img] [img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img][img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img] [img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img][img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img][img]http://img385.imageshack.us/img385/8307/cheer4yx.gif[/img]

Judas 11-27-2005 07:30 PM

Re: More Mac Awesomeness
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jujumantb
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
http://s92915907.onlinehome.us/drag_drop_image.jpg


^ super leet feature of the safari browser. you can drag any image from any page and drop on desktop , folder , etc. btw, in that screen cap, that is me draggin the sig from the page if you cant tell.

this thread is retarded... XP and explorer can drag images onto the desktop and folders too... just without the resource hoarding graphic of the image moving around... rolleyes:

the title of this thread wasnt "THE MOST INTERESTING THING IN THE WORLD EXCLUSIVE TO MAC OSX", so stfu, and gtfo of my thread.

jujumantb 11-27-2005 07:41 PM

Re: More Mac Awesomeness
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
Quote:

Originally Posted by jujumantb
Quote:

Originally Posted by Judas
http://s92915907.onlinehome.us/drag_drop_image.jpg


^ super leet feature of the safari browser. you can drag any image from any page and drop on desktop , folder , etc. btw, in that screen cap, that is me draggin the sig from the page if you cant tell.

this thread is retarded... XP and explorer can drag images onto the desktop and folders too... just without the resource hoarding graphic of the image moving around... rolleyes:

the title of this thread wasnt "THE MOST INTERESTING THING IN THE WORLD EXCLUSIVE TO MAC OSX", so stfu, and gtfo of my thread.

More PC Awesomeness

http://x11.putfile.com/11/33020280513.jpg

^ super leet feature of the windows XP operating system. you can type numbers and calculations into this box and it will display them on the screen. That is me typing a six into the box if you cant tell.

rolleyes:


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.