Free "Never-made-it" sig for who-ever wants it
 

Lots of times I'll start on a sig, but never finish...typically I delete the stuff, but lately I've been saving 'em. Free for anyone who wants to play with it:

[img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/TiberiusAD/Junk/scrap1.jpg[/img]

I'll see if I can find a few more....

I'm working on getting some files availible for anyone who may need them. Things like PSDs, .abr's & other goodies. But I need a tester...

I'm not sure if I have the permissions right for direct download from the public, someone test this link for me & post your results:

http://www.zenlaboratories.com/delta/Downloads/sig8.psd

That dl works, its a nice sig. I am impatient when it comes to more than 5 layers :D i never spend more then 5 minutes on a sig.

would be better if you couldnt see the water behind the chick.

But anyway you know the rules, can you resize your sig TiberiusAD, Maximum Height: 150 px, yours 220 px.

I'm off by 70 pixals. If you intend on enforcing this rule, lets be even across the board with it shall we?

On a related note, I'd like to partition for an extention in sig size rules. Many of us, yourself included like to use multiple images or text below our sigs. Any of which would naturally violate the same principle rule of hight size.

I don't think that an extension up to 250 in hight and 500 in lenth would be unreasonable. This could allow for a quote below a sig...as currently being used, or multiple images, like I had before this one.
Call is Zones, I know. I'll remove mine till we get an answer.

Paine. +1 for the test m8, I'm building a little goodie page now...

They are the rules and they have been like so for a while. People have stuck to them before and you are not special. I am not going to get anal to the last pixel here but you are out by a margin so change it or loose it.


And it's pixels not pixals.


And actually my sig is 130 pixels which leaves more than enough space for some little text underneath.

eek: Why you insist on being prejudice towards me is beyond my understanding. What exacly did I do to you? Are you mad because I use a font? Maybe you don't like the idea that I post ideas? Whatever it is get over it.

I'm not talking about your sig in terms of rule violation. I was using it as a basic example.

You think I am out by a margin, do you. Well let me shed some light on that, and lets see you tell me that it is not personal.

Mine:
[img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/TiberiusAD/sigsavas/zenA1.jpg[/img]

Now go look at these:

Pyro
CoMaToSe (Moderator)
Arkan (Moderator)
TonyMontana (Moderator]
Bleuachdu
Nyck
Judas (Moderator)
Hawke (Moderator)
Duke_of_Ray

I'm not singling these guys out, I just picked a thread and looked for rule violations larger than mine. I don't have a problem with any of these guy's sigs. Apparently niether has anyone else. So tell me why you are bitching about my 70 pixaelis.

this is the sig section. i cant control what or how much text beneath every posters sigs. i can ask the people who post here to keep within the rules. tonys sig etc is 160 pixels so 10 over give some, take some. But yours is 70 pixels over which is about 50% more.

other people have been asked before and changed. you are no special. speak with zone if you have a problem, I didnt make the rules im just enforcing them.


sleeping:

Since you picked Tony, we'll roll with Tony:

[img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/TiberiusAD/sigsavas/4inches.jpg[/img][img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y111/TiberiusAD/sigsavas/zenA1.jpg[/img]

The left is a 4 inch block of purple. The right, my sig.

The block of purple is a little bit shorter than Tony's sig area from line to line. DO YOU SEE THE DIFFERENCE.

Now, what the .What is the deal with all the flack towards me?

As i said the actual sig size is what im trying to control i couldnt care about the text below it.

Now watch the language.


Im finished sleeping:

no offense zen, but you need to get off your pedestal and calm your ego.. rolleyes:

just to be devils advocate here, just as a guess the dimension set is for area based on size and average res (72x72) of a sig, and also what looks best. U can check with zone or bs about, it could be a loop hole. in which case tib would be plenty within the limits. One you should really speak to if your bugged by tibs 70pixel over height is newt 638x995 thats MUCH more than the regulations by any standards. Also, for those that have quotes or what not at the bottom are plenty within the limits since sigs are based upon characters which for this forum i think is 255 so i agree with tib on the fact that if you enforce enforce down to the pixel, until you talk to zone or w/e, for everyone. however quotes should be excluded from size in screen pixels since they are within the character limits

Its what it says nothing else

[quote:0d899]First of all, youve got to understand that there are certain size rules to be followed:

Maximum Width: 450 px.
Maximum Height: 150 px.
Maximum Filesize: 100 kb.
[/quote:0d899]

it has been followed close enough for so long that it isnt hard to not understand

and newt well he is an idiot and thats upto Zoner now to decide what to do with him.

Just rotate the sig and quit whining.

it has been followed close enough for so long that it isnt hard to not understand
[/quote:16b61]

Very true but loops hole and exceptions probably could be made, since over all his sig is tiny, though it does, with out an arguement goes over the height max. so definately check with zone to get the final word and remove any scepticism. EDIT: Looks like it was taken care of
Just being devils advocate

It's not about ego, ffs. Its just about the crap I get for no real reason.

I get crap about everything from the fonts I use, to the ideas I post about, helping others understand whats wrong, and the size comment set me off. I feel un-justly singled out.
And the worst part of the whole thing is we all worked togather at Exalt, and I never once got the impression from anyone that I get now... So whats the problem?
Is this related to when I was a mod and edited out profanity? Was I a nazi because of it? Yes that is retorical.

As far as the sig goes, it's no big deal. I tend to make several a day. I'll ask Zone about how the size relates to text, and ask him directly about extending the size limitations to include text size. The point of the rule is forum stretching as much as it is load time.
I just don't understand where the hate comes from. If its personal hit the PM button, or e-mail me, whatever.

I don't see how I'm being egotistical, I'm simply making a point - and in a much more civilized fashion than most mind you. Maybe thats what the problem is... maybe you think I'm self-centered. But if that were the case, would I be sharing my knowledge, methods, and tricks with everybody?