iran warns america and israel
 

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... 005_pg4_13

On show were thousands of troops and a range of hardware including six of Iran’s Shahab-3 ballistic missiles –which sported banners saying “Death to America”, “We will crush America under our feet” and “Israel must be wiped off the face of the earth”.

they say they want peace and harmony , but then they say statements like that. eek:

I'm sure you've spouted "Kill dem sand naggers" before. You are just as guilty.

Re: iran warns america and israel
 

FFS - What do you expect when America is already drawing plans to invade them? Should the banners say "WELCOME AMERICA!" and "COME ON IN AND DESTROY OUR COUNTRY!" ?

You're a fucking moron if you expect anything other than what you're getting now. IMO, they're on the moral high-ground.

Re: iran warns america and israel
 

i wouldn't go as far as that...

Re: iran warns america and israel
 

Well, let's just say it is much closer than it should be...with USA supposed to be the "good" guys and all.

i think we can all agree that the USA doesn't have Arms Parades with banners that say, "Death to the Middle East and Islam"...

Well, I get the impression that most of you at least think that.

Im sure the US has a contingicy (sp?) plan for every country and every scenerio. That does not mean that is going to happen. Im sure every other country has them too

Can the US afford to go to war with Iran? I think this will be settled behind closed doors.

I'm pretty sure if Irani soldiers were sitting on our borders, we would be saying the same damn thing.

Re: iran warns america and israel
 

I would. Who's the one planning an attack on the other for after the next terrorist attack(even without proof that it comes from).....? Not Iran.

P.s "IMO."

Re: iran warns america and israel
 

every country has plans for that. It's just that in our society, every stupid idiotic American wants to hear 100% of the stuff that's going on behind the Pentagon walls.

[quote="TGB!":dd440]Wow -

If IRAN - yanno the land of freedom and equal rights protection under the law. . .oops silly me, under the KORAN - is on the "moral high ground", lord knows those below have got to be some cold hearted baby-eating mother fuckers.

As for "plans for war" - duh. We got em for CANADA and the NZ as well, although I'm sure some files on countries are little more than aeriel photographs, weather/land conditions and a few off-shore strat. positions. It would be criminally negligent for ANY country to not have such plans, and I'm sure you finger-waggers have plans as well.[/quote:dd440]

I agree. Iran hangs people for being gay in public squares, so yes America for what its worth is on the "morale high-ground", and like TGB said we have battle plans for nearly every country on Earth, as I'm sure numerous others do aswell.

Well can someone explain to me what that talk of the U.S actually using these plans if they're attacked again by a terrorist, was about? Was that just bullshit? I can't remember which thread the link was in but it was an extract from a conservative magazine regarding the acting out of those "contingency" plans, with or without direct evidence of a terrorist attack coming from Iran.

That's what my Morale High Ground opinion is based on/refering too.

I just don't think making war (whether or not the country is under an extremist islamic government) without direct evidence of this hypothetical (but likely) terrorist attack originating from there, is on the 'moral high ground' in relation to a nation that is in a potentially innocent position.

I wasn't refering to the countries themselves. I don't think you guys are that evil, lol. Just in that individual situation. I don't agree with the government in Iran, but then again I don't think that's reason enough to start a war with them.

EDIT:

This is what I was refering too....

[quote=ninty]US already has a contingency plan to attack Iran using nukes, so why not North Korea? Cheney already said if another 9/11 type attack happens, the US has the right to attack Iran, whether they are involved or not.


[quote="From the August 1 Issue of The American Conservative":c2f32]In Washington it is hardly a secret that the same people in and around the administration who brought you Iraq are preparing to do the same for Iran. The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The [b]plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons.[/b] Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. [b]As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States[/b]. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.[/quote]
[url="http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html"]http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html[/url]

This is from a Conservative magazine, so you can't call this "Liberal bias" or anything of that sort.[/quote:c2f32]