![]() |
Saddam was a fucking psycho.
"although the weapons stockpiles were destroyed, Saddam’s government was looking to begin a WMD program again." The UN gave him all the time he wanted. He didn't follow the UN orders. So what happened? Nothing. The UN is a joke. That's why the US had to do something before he could really hurt more people. |
well, if a blogger said it thenit must be true
|
[quote="Sgt>Stackem":9ab79]well, if a blogger said it thenit must be true[/quote:9ab79]
I'm sorry....Did you miss the 25 credible links that ninty also posted? If you tell me they're bias - Then we can all assume you're just a blind follower and have no real opinion of your own. |
Someone wrote to the Toronto Sun newspaper saying;
[quote:91306]Most Americans who support the war in Iraq fall under one or more of three categories: 1.) They're registered Republicans, and will blindly follow the party. 2.) They believe it is the right of the U.S. to dictate their views to the world. 3.) They have a son or daughter serving in the military, and support the war as a defensive mechanism to convince themselves that loss of life is somehow worth it.[/quote:91306] |
iraq is a front on the war against terrorism.
|
[quote="newt.":c7736]iraq is a front on the war against terrorism.[/quote:c7736]
Care to elaborate at all? |
I dont have to read the links. I feel we were justified for Sadaams actions alone. He broke every promise made after the gulf war. The UN is too big a bunch of pussies to stand behind thier own words, so once again it falls on our shoulders. Every country that doesnt back us fully can kiss my ass. We dont need them and we should back out of the UN and kick thier asses out of the US.
here is a link for ya kissmyass.com |
happy:
|
wow, youre so gung ho about this war, why arent you in it yet?
|
[quote=ninty]
Quote:
iraq is, or should be, the beginning to a much larger offensive against terrorism. I dunno if it was right or wrong, just or whatever to invade iraq but now that were there, and our persince is known we need to send a message to radicals throughout the world, that terrorism will not stand, whereever they might hide we must find them/capture them/kill them, whatever country abets terrorists we must overthrow and replace it with something, whatever that is, by the majority of people in that region. I dunno if its "just" or "right" on the world scale, but I would rather have the USA, and its allies in control then terrorist holding the threat of a suicide bombing over our heads. |
thats retarded, terrorists didnt appear in iraq until the coalition invaded. if we wanted to make a stand we should have flooded afghanistan and pakistan with troops instead of entering the wrong country. who says the US has a handle on terrorism. there is nothing you can do to prevent a terrorist attack. anyone could make any kind of attack anywhere and at anytime. what message have we sent to radical islam that wasnt said before? osama hasnt been caught and there hasnt been any justice for what happened on 9/11. we just wasted a shit load of money and lost over a thousand troops. GG us.
|
Quote:
|
I sometimes think it's possible that Bush knows what he is doing. He is in Iraq to "attract" extremists into Iraq and fight the soldiers. Sort of creating a decoy to prevent the extremists from doing more bombings in other countries and so on. eek:
|
what does it matter? we're there, now lets lift up the men and women who are being shot at, and make sure that their efforts do not go unnoticed. right or wrong...the armchair generals and quasi-political experts need to shut their mouths.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.