Phasers vs Bullets
 

is being killed by a phaser less violent than by a bullet?

like Star Trek phaser? That basically burns a hole in ya, unless they set it on stun!

[img]http://www.unificationfrance.com/IMG/jpg/kirk_phaser_2.jpg[/img]

Phaser/lazer = instant death in movies so that's the way I'd rather go

oneoneone

well not everyone dies from phaser/lazers in the movies.

yeh def

Ok, but phasers dont always work against the borg, so Im gonna say bullets. Which brings up a good question: After encountering the borg the first time, which didnt the federation invest in some projectile weaponry?
PS this is a discussion I never want to repeat.

after long thought, I've come to the conclusion of "afrodj13"

Bullets are far more violent then Phasers.

Phasers emit a beam of light ,not unlike a green laser pointer, that appears to make no visible mark or wound on the person and could just as eaisly be putting the person to sleep as it is killing them. Not to mention many of the times you see a Phaser used in Star Trek they have it set to "stun" which temporarly knocks a person out rather then killing them.

Bullets on the other hand make large flashes of light and very loud noises, which then enter the person at a very fast speed usually resulting in severe internal damage and massive bleeding. Not to forget, Guns & Bullets are real.

i just saw war of the worlds and yeah id have to say their "phaser" type things kicked ass. so yeah id take one of those please to turn people into dust.

bullet is more violent, but phasers are more pimpin.

Bullets cause more bodily trauma then lasers. Phasers are more effective in general.

Tactical Nukes 4tw

Fuck guns and phasers brown noise is the king.

Basicly a sound so bad it can make you shit yourself uncontrollably and at higher levels can cause your guts to explode rock:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... rown+noise