
10-22-2002, 11:59 AM
Based on a claim of making $250 a day, if founding law works 40 hours a week, he makes $65K a year (all speculation). Now his name suggests that he has a thing for the law, maybe even a lawyer. Then he posts a plagerized flame and passes it off as his own. In this flame there is a dergaugatory (sp?) comment about lawyers which is inconsistent with his name. Not to mention, $65K is a pretty lame salary for a lawyer. What does all this nonsense and contradiction mean. Nothing really because I am making a bunch of assumptions myself. But I still think the kid is an idiot.
|