Thread: 100% BS
View Single Post
Old
  (#27)
ED! is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 598
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cave #23, Afghanistan
 Send a message via ICQ to ED!  
Default 09-09-2003, 04:56 PM

[quote="Sgt Stryker":782c7]I don't download music, assclown, I never said I did.

so what are you saying?
instead of busting hackers who could cause me harm ISPs should bust downloaders who don't do shit to me but harm teh recording industry?
Like I said, who pays the ISP's bills: me, or RIAA?

BTW, what's more important to mankind:

40GB of cancer research data destroyed by a hacker who could have had the plug pulled on him long ago,
or a couple paltry million that RIAA lost to downloads?

ISPs only have so many resources they can contribute to the war on cyber-terrorism (hacking and virusing to you civvies), yet RIAA demands that they take these precious resources away to fight a much less heinous crime.[/quote:782c7]

Again using circular arguments to justify your point. A matter of priorities is BEYOND the point. You are breaking the law. You are breaking a law that potentially takes money out of the hands of others. The RIAA could care less about Cancer Research since they - wait for it - arent doctors studying cancer research. If the FBI wants the name of some hacker who hacked some bullshit, then theyll go after them too. And, ahem - yanno theres more than ONE division of the FBI dedicated to cyber-crime. See they have it set up that way to make sure lil bastards like yourself who want to pull the "but mommy he's doing it", or "omg h4x0rz there r worc ppl than me!" arguments have no leg to stand on. The FBI and relevant industries will go after the offenders that are affecting THEIR livelyhood.
  
Reply With Quote