Alliedassault - View Single Post

A HUNGRY FATMAN · 11-06-2003, 09:26 PM

naw armageddon was more realistic then the core come on. but all the disater moves suck they all end the same way

#1. world is threatend.
#2. hero(badass 99%of the time) is reluctint to save world but then decides to.
#3. hero is given cool james bond techno stuff to do it
#4. hero valintly(and it must be valintly) dies in proces(80%of the time)
#5. plan ends up being a flop and the world is distroyed anyway.
#6. the rest of the main characters live anyway despite the worlds ecosysetms being totaly distroyed they some how get food,air, and clothing and all the other suplies that they have when the movie ends but there very sad over the loss of the hero that they all hated to begin with.

	(#22)
A HUNGRY FATMAN is Offline Senior Member Posts: 427 Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: PA	11-06-2003, 09:26 PM naw armageddon was more realistic then the core come on. but all the disater moves suck they all end the same way #1. world is threatend. #2. hero(badass 99%of the time) is reluctint to save world but then decides to. #3. hero is given cool james bond techno stuff to do it #4. hero valintly(and it must be valintly) dies in proces(80%of the time) #5. plan ends up being a flop and the world is distroyed anyway. #6. the rest of the main characters live anyway despite the worlds ecosysetms being totaly distroyed they some how get food,air, and clothing and all the other suplies that they have when the movie ends but there very sad over the loss of the hero that they all hated to begin with.