
11-20-2003, 01:47 PM
Actually ,
There is enormous proof that the historical timeline of the bible is accurate.
There are sighns of Noahs flood still present today. There have been several Archeological discoveries that show that not only the cities of the bible existed but are located where the bibles says they were.
The biggest problem is , the bible was written in a language that no longer exists. And has been translated to several different languages since. So in my oppion the words one would read from it , cannot be taken as EXACTLY what happened. The translation would just mess it all up. Sort of like telling a story to your friend , he then tells the story to others , them to others and so on. By the time the story got back to you it would be different.
As far as Jesus goes.......I think he was a man of profound wisdom and knowledge. I do believe that his touch alone could heal. However I do not believe he was a son of a god. Think about it.....How would you describe a man like that during that time frame? What words would you use to explain him in the time of the Roman Empire?
I do not follow Christ related religions because of the church. I believe the Vatican holds more secrets than the American Government! lol.
Gonna stop there for now , alot to take in and talk about......
|