View Single Post
Old
  (#57)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 12-14-2003, 10:53 PM

[quote="Cpt. Obvious":92efe]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
http://www.boston.com/news/local/connecticut/articles/2003/09/11/uconn_professor_on_quest_to_prove_time_travel_poss ible/

This is a really great article. If your interested in this stuff, its a good read. This was the guy I was talking about.

[quote:92efe]Mallett's theory is based largely on Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity and his special theory of relativity. The general theory states that the closer an object is to a gravitational source, the slower time moves. Under the special theory, Enistein said the faster an object, like a jet, moves relative to the speed of light, the slower time moves.

This was proved in 1975, when Einstein's theory was tested by using two synchronized atomic clocks -- one on an airplane and another on the ground. When the plane landed, the time of its clock was behind the one on the ground, though by only fractions of a second, Mallett said.

"But this proves you can travel into the future," he said.

Travelling into the past is a bit more complicated, and that's where Mallett's theory goes beyond Einstein's theories. Mallett believes that light also generates a gravitational field.
There you go. Time travel into the future is possible. Its already been done and proved.[/quote:92efe]
the government should do experiments on this by sending a rocket in to orbit with a large fuel supply and have it orbit around earth at a very high speed. Then they would compare the rockets clock with the clocks on earth.[/quote:92efe]

I could just see a NASA Press guy announcing that to The US public. Im sure everyone would consider it to accomplish something.

Basiclly people were spending 3 billions dollars of your tax dollars to compare a clock in space with a clock on earth......
  
Reply With Quote