[Coleman]

Originally Posted by Tripper

I've seen it....to sum it up:

First half: Not so great acting, terrible script, beautiful cinematography, a bit of action. Overall - Not so great.

Second half: Picks up a bit from the first with more action, better acting as actors become more comfortable with roles, writing doesn't change much, the story becomes slightly more interesting. Overall - better than first half, but still not very great.

Film was alright - 6/10...

thanks for the warning. The worst thing for any war movie is bad acting. If the actors suck, no action can make up for what the acting takes away.