Alliedassault - View Single Post - Well, there was a reason AvP wasn't screened

Hollywood · 08-13-2004, 12:29 PM

Ok besides Tarantino, because he has to be the exception here. He has the exact same feeling as myself, in that cgi has taken over for practical effects and story. Unfortunately he can only do one movie every so often, so that still leaves 99% of films that need to pick up the slack.

And as for Fox cutting the movie, yes it is rumored but also I heard that Paul Anderson set out to make a PG-13 movie from teh get-go. Unless we get a much longer directors cut on DVD (this seems to be the excuse every time a movie sucks and it looks like it was hacked to pieces, but it never happens) then I can only assume Paul has done it again.

	(#15)
Hollywood is Offline Senior Member Posts: 1,565 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education"	08-13-2004, 12:29 PM Ok besides Tarantino, because he has to be the exception here. He has the exact same feeling as myself, in that cgi has taken over for practical effects and story. Unfortunately he can only do one movie every so often, so that still leaves 99% of films that need to pick up the slack. And as for Fox cutting the movie, yes it is rumored but also I heard that Paul Anderson set out to make a PG-13 movie from teh get-go. Unless we get a much longer directors cut on DVD (this seems to be the excuse every time a movie sucks and it looks like it was hacked to pieces, but it never happens) then I can only assume Paul has done it again.