Alliedassault - View Single Post

-DJK- · 06-10-2001, 12:21 AM

"just shut up the topic was over before and your just fighting for something you'll never get so I suggest we all just ignore djk"

Oh, yes, ignore me. That's always better than considering a good point. God knows if I disagree w/you, I must be an idiot.

"You have way to much time on your hands and you should think about doing something meaningful for once."

I still don't understand what my having free time has anything to do w/it.

"The one thing that stands out in Saving Private Ryan is the blood and gore, but there have been WW2 movies made long ago that are just as good without the blood and gore."

Actually, I disagree. I've seen some of those old WWII movies, the way they just throw their hands up in the air and fall over when they're hit, no blood or anything. It's pretty corny, and quite hard to take seriously. Saving Private Ryan blows those movies away.

"This game is being made available to a greater audience because the blood and gore is being left out, and you know what, I say good work 2015 and EA."

They could just have eaisly made it available to a greater audience by simply having a choice whether you want blood and gore when you first install, or having some sort of violence lock. By totally leaving blood and gore out, they exclude those who can handle it and feel it adds greatly to the realism.

I guess in the end, it comes down to what you're looking for in a war/combat fps. I personally am looking for as realistic an experence I can get, and having blood and gore when people get shot/blown up is a big part of it. Since MOH:AA won't have any, it won't be very realistic. Because of this, I probably won't be buying it. I have NO interest in a war game that's been toned down so it's approprate for little children.

"If you think blood is such an important part of a game why dont you go buy RtCW and SoF2, but if you dont buy this game you WILL be missing out on a game that will be just as good if not better than those 2 put together."

I'm not sure what "RtCW" stands for, but don't count out SOF2. It will no doubtly have some VERY realistic combat, and w/GHOULII, it'll make MOH:AA look like a kids game(which it just might be).

The bottom line, I'm looking for REALISTIC combat. Not, AS realistic as it can be and still be suitable for children.

[This message has been edited by -DJK- (edited June 10, 2001).]

	(#49)
-DJK- is Offline Senior Member Posts: 108 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Buffalo, NY USA	06-10-2001, 12:21 AM "just shut up the topic was over before and your just fighting for something you'll never get so I suggest we all just ignore djk" Oh, yes, ignore me. That's always better than considering a good point. God knows if I disagree w/you, I must be an idiot. "You have way to much time on your hands and you should think about doing something meaningful for once." I still don't understand what my having free time has anything to do w/it. "The one thing that stands out in Saving Private Ryan is the blood and gore, but there have been WW2 movies made long ago that are just as good without the blood and gore." Actually, I disagree. I've seen some of those old WWII movies, the way they just throw their hands up in the air and fall over when they're hit, no blood or anything. It's pretty corny, and quite hard to take seriously. Saving Private Ryan blows those movies away. "This game is being made available to a greater audience because the blood and gore is being left out, and you know what, I say good work 2015 and EA." They could just have eaisly made it available to a greater audience by simply having a choice whether you want blood and gore when you first install, or having some sort of violence lock. By totally leaving blood and gore out, they exclude those who can handle it and feel it adds greatly to the realism. I guess in the end, it comes down to what you're looking for in a war/combat fps. I personally am looking for as realistic an experence I can get, and having blood and gore when people get shot/blown up is a big part of it. Since MOH:AA won't have any, it won't be very realistic. Because of this, I probably won't be buying it. I have NO interest in a war game that's been toned down so it's approprate for little children. "If you think blood is such an important part of a game why dont you go buy RtCW and SoF2, but if you dont buy this game you WILL be missing out on a game that will be just as good if not better than those 2 put together." I'm not sure what "RtCW" stands for, but don't count out SOF2. It will no doubtly have some VERY realistic combat, and w/GHOULII, it'll make MOH:AA look like a kids game(which it just might be). The bottom line, I'm looking for REALISTIC combat. Not, AS realistic as it can be and still be suitable for children. [This message has been edited by -DJK- (edited June 10, 2001).]