Alliedassault - View Single Post

Hawke · 05-13-2005, 11:11 PM

[quote="Sgt. Duffy":91909]You ever noticed as the more dangerous the weapons become, the less casualties there are? I mean, christ, look at all the Medieval wars...thousands die within an hour. Then there goes the Civil War...millions die, and the rifles are weak as guck...modern combat, and we got the most souped-up weapons ever, and somehow the casualties are only in the thousands (Not that thats not high, just compared to past history..)[/quote:91909]
We're not fighting a body of over 1 million soldiers at the moment. It's a just a few thousands terrorist. Which would mean less dealth.

This idea is pure oOo: . However, I don't see it as reality. How could something possibly cycle so fast? I mean what can you actually do 120,000 times in a mintue? 2000 rounds a second? What can you do 2000 times in a second? Hell, you can barely do anything 10 times in a second. The world is on track for one major fuck up.

	(#32)
Hawke is Offline Senior Member Posts: 3,546 Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Ohio	05-13-2005, 11:11 PM [quote="Sgt. Duffy":91909]You ever noticed as the more dangerous the weapons become, the less casualties there are? I mean, christ, look at all the Medieval wars...thousands die within an hour. Then there goes the Civil War...millions die, and the rifles are weak as guck...modern combat, and we got the most souped-up weapons ever, and somehow the casualties are only in the thousands (Not that thats not high, just compared to past history..)[/quote:91909] We're not fighting a body of over 1 million soldiers at the moment. It's a just a few thousands terrorist. Which would mean less dealth. This idea is pure oOo: . However, I don't see it as reality. How could something possibly cycle so fast? I mean what can you actually do 120,000 times in a mintue? 2000 rounds a second? What can you do 2000 times in a second? Hell, you can barely do anything 10 times in a second. The world is on track for one major fuck up.