Alliedassault - View Single Post - Twenty Things We Now Know Four Years After 9/11

Short Hand · 09-01-2005, 11:18 PM

[quote=ninty][quote="TGB!":f09ee][color=indigo][b]Youre fishing - and you have the benefit of HINDSIGHT to say - "oh well these guys should have done so and so. . ." -

Theres nothing in the PDB that says an attack is imminent or that the WTC is a target (and of course being a SUPER BRAIN you know the WTC is NOT a "Federal Building").[/b][/color][/quote]

[url="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050901/pl_nm/security_attacks_pentagon_dc"]http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050901/pl_ ... entagon_dc[/url]

Regardless, any information on an attack should ahve been handled with the upmost of concern, which I don't believe it was, and which I believe Short was trying to argue.[/quote:f09ee]

yes.

	(#36)
Short Hand is Offline Brigadier General Posts: 10,721 Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?	09-01-2005, 11:18 PM [quote=ninty][quote="TGB!":f09ee][color=indigo][b]Youre fishing - and you have the benefit of HINDSIGHT to say - "oh well these guys should have done so and so. . ." - Theres nothing in the PDB that says an attack is imminent or that the WTC is a target (and of course being a SUPER BRAIN you know the WTC is NOT a "Federal Building").[/b][/color][/quote] [url="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050901/pl_nm/security_attacks_pentagon_dc"]http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050901/pl_ ... entagon_dc[/url] Regardless, any information on an attack should ahve been handled with the upmost of concern, which I don't believe it was, and which I believe Short was trying to argue.[/quote:f09ee] yes.