Alliedassault - View Single Post - SD bans almost all abortions, challenges Roe v. Wade

TGB! · 02-26-2006, 05:46 PM

[quote:3767f]Abortion would not have to be a choice if society helped these unexpected mothers more...[/quote:3767f]

Another fine comment that has no place in reality -

You think the majority of women who get abortions are down on their luck minorities/poor whites who cant afford a kid?

[quote:3767f]you 'pro lifers' force your moral opinions on other people about how life is sacred, but then cut funding for mothers who cant afford to raise kids[/quote:3767f]

The two have fuck all to do with each other. Because I dont agree with abitrarily ending the life of a child, means that I should then have to SUPPORT all these children? Hardly. Morally, I can disagree with homosexuality, but that doesnt mean I'm going to take it to the next step and start rallying against them, or distrubiting anti-gay literature.

[quote:3767f]precisely why they wanted the abortion in the first place.[/quote:3767f]

Ill rope you in with ol' Master ShortHand up there - what do you think are the reasons women get abortions. . .and what do you think the demographics are. You'd be suprised how many successful women are saying "Fuck this" when that urine-stick reads positive.

[quote:3767f]maybe you should worry about your own affairs and keep your noses out of other peoples business.[/quote:3767f]

Do you have a problem with older men/women have consensual sex with minors 12-18, or think people engaging in such actions such be prosecuted or have their actions regulated?

[quote:3767f]keep that in mind next time you think that girls shouldnt be having sex[/quote:3767f]

The sign of a weak argument, is when someone has to reframe what their opponent has said. Noone here said to NOT have sex. However if you have IRRESPONSIBLE SEX - then the consequences are on your head. Period.

	(#36)
TGB! is Offline Command Sergeant Major Posts: 2,644 Join Date: Dec 2003	02-26-2006, 05:46 PM [quote:3767f]Abortion would not have to be a choice if society helped these unexpected mothers more...[/quote:3767f] Another fine comment that has no place in reality - You think the majority of women who get abortions are down on their luck minorities/poor whites who cant afford a kid? [quote:3767f]you 'pro lifers' force your moral opinions on other people about how life is sacred, but then cut funding for mothers who cant afford to raise kids[/quote:3767f] The two have fuck all to do with each other. Because I dont agree with abitrarily ending the life of a child, means that I should then have to SUPPORT all these children? Hardly. Morally, I can disagree with homosexuality, but that doesnt mean I'm going to take it to the next step and start rallying against them, or distrubiting anti-gay literature. [quote:3767f]precisely why they wanted the abortion in the first place.[/quote:3767f] Ill rope you in with ol' Master ShortHand up there - what do you think are the reasons women get abortions. . .and what do you think the demographics are. You'd be suprised how many successful women are saying "Fuck this" when that urine-stick reads positive. [quote:3767f]maybe you should worry about your own affairs and keep your noses out of other peoples business.[/quote:3767f] Do you have a problem with older men/women have consensual sex with minors 12-18, or think people engaging in such actions such be prosecuted or have their actions regulated? [quote:3767f]keep that in mind next time you think that girls shouldnt be having sex[/quote:3767f] The sign of a weak argument, is when someone has to reframe what their opponent has said. Noone here said to NOT have sex. However if you have IRRESPONSIBLE SEX - then the consequences are on your head. Period.