Alliedassault - View Single Post

ninty · 09-06-2002, 08:44 PM

I don't think its right to compare Hitler to Saddam.

Saddam doens't have nearly the capabilities the Germans did in the 30's and 40's.

The bottom line is that if Saddam is making weapons to kill a whole bunch of people then he needs to be stopped, correct? Even if there is going to be a lot of casualties, thats what an army is for. To protect its citizens. But only invade after the proof is there and they haev thought about this carefully with the worlds approval.

	(#19)
ninty is Offline Major General Posts: 12,683 Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Calgary	09-06-2002, 08:44 PM I don't think its right to compare Hitler to Saddam. Saddam doens't have nearly the capabilities the Germans did in the 30's and 40's. The bottom line is that if Saddam is making weapons to kill a whole bunch of people then he needs to be stopped, correct? Even if there is going to be a lot of casualties, thats what an army is for. To protect its citizens. But only invade after the proof is there and they haev thought about this carefully with the worlds approval.