Math Theory

Bleuachdu · **Math Theory -** 10-08-2002, 05:08 PM

I came up with this equation a few months ago, and I have been playing around with it ever since. I've never really showed it to any other people, and I thought this would be a good way to evaluate it. This invlovles finding a an unknown square of a known number using two other variables. I came up with this for the purpose of finding a numbers square (x*x) without the use of a calculator. However, it has proven to be not all that useful. It still involves multiplying large numbers. The method used ends up being an identity (x^2=x^2), broken down into addition and multiplication. It shows a very interesting relationship between the root and square of two different numbers. Its very basic algebra, but I don't think I've seen anything like it before. If you have and I'm just an idiot, let me know! OK, the theory goes... Given any number in {R} X, the square can be calculated as the sum of y^2 + xz + yz, where Y is any number in {R} and Z is the difference of X and Y.

[quote:2a502]
EQUATION
{R,R}
x^2 = x squared
y^2 = y squared
z = x-y

x^2 = xz + yz + y^2

Substitute for Z
x^2 = [x(x-y) + y(x-y)] + y^2

x^2 = [x^2 -xy + xy - y^2] + y^2

x^2 = [x^2 - y^2] + y^2

x^2 = x^2

EXAMPLE
x = 34
y = 4
x^2 = ?
y^2 = 16
z = 30

x^2 = 34*30 + 4*30 + 16

x^2 = 1020 + 120 + 16

x^2 = 1156
[/quote:2a502]

Can anyone disprove it? If so, let me know. The Domain and Range may not be {R,R}, I'm not sure. Find any problems with it ? Like I said, I've never done much with it other than think about it and play around with it. Its not very practical or useful, but it is fairly interesting. Gimme some feedback!

CaP bUsTa · 10-08-2002, 05:10 PM

1+1=2

KTOG · 10-08-2002, 05:11 PM

quite useless, yet seems to be true.

10-08-2002, 05:12 PM

mash owns math every day!

Recycled Spooge · 10-08-2002, 05:27 PM

HUH!? You like to play around with math on your own? Get the hell out of this forum you freak!!

Low spark · 10-08-2002, 05:32 PM

Never play around with math without adult supervision, Your head could explode.

KTOG · 10-08-2002, 06:05 PM

pikachu, whats your major at good ol U of M ?

Bleuachdu · 10-08-2002, 06:10 PM

Keg stands with minor in beer bongs. currently taking Fraternity House Repair 101: duct tape.

SoLiDUS · 10-08-2002, 06:34 PM

It's interesting but not very practical.

Lemme play around with it for a bit, I'll give you some feedback soon...
biggrin:

Art Attack · 10-08-2002, 06:59 PM

damn you Louis and your stupid Trigonomitry

Vance · 10-08-2002, 06:59 PM

couldnt you just say 34^2 = 1156?

SoLiDUS · 10-08-2002, 07:58 PM

From what I could gather, it is simply a modified number trick: neat, but
utterly useless biggrin:

It only works because the right-hand side creates an equality (thanks, capt.
Obvious!) provided one inputs the proper numbers, Z having a special trait.
What got me interested in your trick was the square root idea: I've always
wondered whether calculators used a special equation for solving the above
mentioned or used a brute force method...

I've checked a couple of sites and one method, the CORDIC Algorithm, can
solve the square root problem with a special equation. Check it out of you
want:

[url:3782a]http://www.math.utep.edu/Faculty/helmut/cordic/wcordic.html[/url:3782a]

I'll keep looking to see if they all use this method...

r3mix · 10-08-2002, 08:04 PM

i just used Pi and i got the same thing

use Pi
Pi is good

Blitz-krieg · 10-08-2002, 09:15 PM

HUH? What kind of math is this Pre Calc or Calc? It's certainly not Sequential Math III and i'm mad confused ... explain ur theory thorougly .......... cause right now i'm ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????? in my head

Sergeant_Scrotum · 10-08-2002, 09:17 PM

[img]http://www.boomspeed.com/message_pics/postmonkstoptalking.jpeg[/img]