[Unknown soldier]

Are you for it or like me against it? I think Bush is just a warcrazed asshole!

[Das Khalif]

Of what i heard. China,Kazakhstan,Russia,Mongolia and other country around there. They are having a economy prosperity by 7% by year. And United states are trying to get the petroleum, cuz if they take control of it at this time that will decrease the speed of china and other economy. Thats why Bush want to take that petroleum and stay master of the world..

I'm not against it and not with the war, my opinion won't change Bush decision.

[Milla]

I say we get this fucking war over, im going broke paying for gas.

[Vance]

I say we stop making these stupid ass threads that turn into flame wars

Its not for the oil, we could have taken that over last war. Its becuase saddam is a dangerous dictator that is now trying to amass weapons of mass destruction. It is preemptive, we strike before he can. He has broken UN rules, has run around doing whatever he wants too long. He is an evil man, and needs to be taken out of power. Enough of the hippy crap about not fighting, sometimes it needs to be done.

[Das Khalif]

[quote="[JuGGeRnAuT]":41e62]Its not for the oil, we could have taken that over last war. Its becuase saddam is a dangerous dictator that is now trying to amass weapons of mass destruction. It is preemptive, we strike before he can. He has broken UN rules, has run around doing whatever he wants too long. He is an evil man, and needs to be taken out of power. Enough of the hippy crap about not fighting, sometimes it needs to be done.[/quote:41e62]

You talk like Bush heh. I think he said something like that.

am I for removing Saddam? yes

am I for doing it now? hell no

why?
1. the government (ours) is already in defecit due to the tax cut and fuzzy math, the last thing we need is to blow a lot of money on war.
2. Bush has done too much yapping already, when one intends to strike one does so with as little noise as possible, thanks to all the propagana and shit Iraq already has their oil fields rigged for demolishion, we could have a disaster on our hands when after defeating their army.
3. mor time could get more proof, more proof=more allies, more allies=easier for us to run occupation/reconstruction afterwards
4. considering that the economy is slowing if the other ragheads decide to cut off our oil we will be in deep sheisse.
5. let's finish Afghanistan first, at darkest estimates Iraq won't be a real threat for another year.

well if you dont see the reasons for war in iraq, then you are an idot. IM sorry, the only reason you could be anti-war was if you were an anarchist, or an anti-Bush believer, neither of the reasons are about the actually topic, just about being oppositional. You have to see what is necessary is not always what is pretty, and kind, and nice.

[quote="[JuGGeRnAuT]":57e77]well if you dont see the reasons for war in iraq, then you are an idot. IM sorry, the only reason you could be anti-war was if you were an anarchist, or an anti-Bush believer, neither of the reasons are about the actually topic, just about being oppositional. You have to see what is necessary is not always what is pretty, and kind, and nice.[/quote:57e77]

interestingly enough I was for the war UNTIL the administration started saying all this bullshit about how 120 mile range rockets can harm the US hake:

move as quickly as possible? thats exactly opposite of anti-war cause. If you move slowly, then you might pressure them into change, which is what has been happening in my mind. There will be no need for preparatiion, or need for stealth, this war will end in months. THe iraqi army is still in tatters from 91.

and i dont see why people think Iraq gives us oil. WTF are you thinking, would Iraq sell us oil? No. Its from places like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait (ya know, the one we had to protect from saddam) and not only that, but we get more oil from canada and venezuela than from the middle east

THe missiles are another reason why we need to attack, becuase they will use them, and have used ones like them on other countries around them. They dont have a responsible government, and are toying with things they shouldnt be allowed to have.

[quote="[JuGGeRnAuT]":2d3cd]move as quickly as possible? thats exactly opposite of anti-war cause. If you move slowly, then you might pressure them into change, which is what has been happening in my mind. There will be no need for preparatiion, or need for stealth, this war will end in months. THe iraqi army is still in tatters from 91.

and i dont see why people think Iraq gives us oil. WTF are you thinking, would Iraq sell us oil? No. Its from places like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait (ya know, the one we had to protect from saddam) and not only that, but we get more oil from canada and venezuela than from the middle east[/quote:2d3cd]

did I say we get oil from Iraq?

can you read?

I said that with current levels of anti-US sentiment among the OTHER raghead states they could cut of our oil in an embargo like in the 70s.

Im sure Kuwait is way in support of Iraq. hake:

well wait, no. becuase Iraq invaded them a decade ago. so, they hate iraq? They love us? oh yeah, they wouldnt cut off oil

[Milla]

[quote="Sgt Stryker":83231]interestingly enough I was for the war UNTIL the administration started saying all this bullshit about how 120 mile range rockets can harm the US hake:[/quote:83231]

ok we have troops about 10 miles off the border of iraq, 120 mile missles can kill alot of our troops man. hake:

[quote="[JuGGeRnAuT]":decbc]Im sure Kuwait is way in support of Iraq. hake:

well wait, no. becuase Iraq invaded them a decade ago. so, they hate iraq? They love us? oh yeah, they wouldnt cut off oil[/quote:decbc]

love us?
not bloody likely

ragheads are trecherous, more so than the frogs, and just look at how many times we saved the frogs and they're still ingrates