Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Politics, Current Events & History
Reload this Page Prime Minister Martin To Address The Nation Thursday
Politics, Current Events & History Debates on politics, current events, and world history.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prime Minister Martin To Address The Nation Thursday
Old
  (#1)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default Prime Minister Martin To Address The Nation Thursday - 04-20-2005, 09:01 PM

[quote:1908d]Martin to Address Nation About Scandal

Wed April 20, 2005 7:01 PM GMT-04:00

By David Ljunggren and Randall Palmer

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Prime Minister Paul Martin will make a rare nationwide televised address on Thursday to discuss an escalating cash-for-favors scandal, but he will not propose dissolving Parliament and calling an election, an aide said on Wednesday.

Uproar over the scandal has paralyzed Parliament and opposition parties seem poised to topple Martin's minority Liberal government and force a June vote.

A public inquiry into the scandal has heard that money from a sponsorship program designed to boost Canadian unity in French-speaking Quebec was funneled to Liberal-friendly advertising firms, often for little or no work.

"The prime minister will speak about the sponsorship program and the current situation in Parliament. We're clearly in an exceptional political circumstance," Martin's chief spokesman Scott Reid told Reuters.

"While he will not be proposing that Parliament be dissolved or prorogued (suspended), he will be direct in saying what he has done and what he believes should be done to address the current situation," Reid said.

The last time a prime minister formally addressed the nation in this way was Jean Chretien in 1995 in the run-up to a referendum on independence for Quebec, parliamentary officials said. Martin will speak at 7:45 p.m. (2345 GMT) on Thursday.

Martin says the inquiry should be allowed to finish before an election is held. Judge John Gomery, who is heading the probe, is due to release his final report in December.

Polls show that if an election were held today, the most likely result would be a minority government led by the official opposition Conservative Party of Stephen Harper.

News of the televised address did not impress opposition parties, who said if Martin had ideas on how to solve the current stalemate he should make them to Parliament.

The Liberals have been in power since November 1993, but the party lost its majority in the House of Commons in an election last June amid anger over the scandal.

The advertising program was designed to promote Canadian unity in Quebec after separatists nearly won the referendum. But the inquiry has unveiled allegations of kickbacks to the Liberal Party in connection with the program.

Although opposition parties say they have not decided whether to try to topple the government and trigger an election, the language of their statements has raised the likelihood of a June 27 vote.

"All Liberals have done a lot of damage to this country, to the image of federalism in Quebec, and that's why it's necessary for the people of Quebec and of all the provinces to replace this government," said Harper.

Martin set up the inquiry into the scandal in February 2004 and has been in serious trouble politically ever since.

"He presumably could have buried this whole thing, but he chose not to, and it may even cost him his prime ministership," senior Liberal parliamentarian John McKay told reporters.

The Conservatives, vowing to explore every avenue to put pressure on the Liberals, will ask a parliamentary committee to approve a nonbinding motion of non-confidence in Martin's government.

The measure will be formally introduced into the public accounts committee on May 2 and if approved -- which seems likely -- it would then be voted on within 10 days.

Asked whether the Liberals could ignore the results of a full parliamentary vote on what would be a nonbinding motion, leading Conservative Jay Hill replied:

"If the majority of the members of Parliament elected to the House of Commons voted in favor of non-confidence, it would be extremely hard for the prime minister to maintain that he had the confidence of the House."[/quote:1908d]
http://www.reuters.ca/locales/c_newsArt ... ID=8244451


Vote green.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2)
Zoner is Offline
Administrator
 
Zoner's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,739
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Camp Crystal Lake
   
Default 04-21-2005, 08:05 AM

*snore*

I'll be watching Survivor. I'll catch what he has to say in the Globe & Mail tomorrow.


http://www.fpsgameforums.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=5399&dateline=1213387  247
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 04-21-2005, 08:07 AM

Im not too familiar with this but I heard it refered to as "The Canadian Watergate"
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 04-21-2005, 03:10 PM

Just old school politics in my opinion...filtering cash to friends in government aint something new...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 04-21-2005, 05:26 PM

Very interesting.

Martin actually apologized and took some responsibility as finance minister at the time. This is the first time i've ever heard a politician apologize.

He also said they'd call an election within 30 days of final gomery report, which won't be until late this year. Opposition parties could still bring the government though with a non confidence vote.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6)
Short Hand is Offline
Brigadier General
 
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
   
Default 04-22-2005, 06:30 AM

I don't want to see the Conservatives take the house again, WHAT I want to see is the NDP, or even the Bloc some how take it.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7)
Sgt>Stackem is Offline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3,161
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
   
Default 04-22-2005, 06:55 AM

sounds like politics are the same everywhere
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8)
Zoner is Offline
Administrator
 
Zoner's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,739
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Camp Crystal Lake
   
Default 04-22-2005, 08:38 AM

^ Yep.

In a nutshell (for our non-Canucks here), the reigning Liberal Government is in the midst of an advertising scandal whereby it has been shown that certain Liberals took kickbacks/bribes from Quebec advertising firms, ensuring that those firms got first dibs on juicy government contracts. There were bogus invoices, money paid for NO work, etc etc.

Corruption and general misuse of taxpayer money, basically. The Gomery Inquiry is getting to the bottom of the whole thing as we speak.

As for Martin's speech, it seemed heartfelt and I agree that an election shouldn't be called until after we know the Gomery findings. This probably won't happen since the opposition will probably force an election this summer.


http://www.fpsgameforums.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=5399&dateline=1213387  247
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9)
TonyMontana is Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 7,860
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: one
  Send a message via AIM to TonyMontana Send a message via MSN to TonyMontana  
Default 04-22-2005, 12:12 PM

Jack Layton for PM


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10)
Pyro is Offline
Chief of Staff General
 
Pyro's Avatar
 
Posts: 20,691
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brampton Ontario Canada
  Send a message via AIM to Pyro Send a message via MSN to Pyro  
Default 04-22-2005, 02:07 PM

I don't know...but I just don't want Conservatives to runt he country. I can almost understand why USA chooses it because of where they sit in the world, but i don't see Canada needing it whatsoever.

Even if they manage a couple things better than the Liberals, they are still are on the wrong side on the fence with way too many issues for me ever to swing a vote to them.

Id like to see NDP be the majority one time...but im not very optimistic as i think it may be too good to be true type situation.


  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#11)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 04-23-2005, 09:16 AM

How could martin take responsibility....Chrétien hated his fucking guts...
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#12)
ninty is Offline
Major General
 
ninty's Avatar
 
Posts: 12,683
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary
   
Default 04-23-2005, 09:19 AM

Martin was the finance minister at the time...so i really don't know how he couldn't have known what was going on. He apologized for not being more vigilant.
  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Machette is Offline
Major
 
Machette's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
   
Default 04-23-2005, 04:09 PM

Guess you could say he covered it up...
  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.