Alliedassault           
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Alliedassault > Lounge > Offtopic
Reload this Page M16 Vs Ak-47 Vs M4A1 vs AK-74
Offtopic Any topics not related to the games we cover. Doesn't mean this is a Spam-fest. Profanity is allowed, enter at your own risk.

View Poll Results: M-16, AK47, M4A1, or AK-74
M-16 2 9.52%
AK-47 12 57.14%
M4A1 5 23.81%
AK-74 2 9.52%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old
  (#10)
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
   
Default 09-03-2003, 04:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninty9
As deleto said, 5.56 nato rounds were meant to wound, so that the enemy has to get 2 other people to carry the wounded guy off the battlefield, therefore eliminating 3 people instead of one.
provided that:

1: your enemy CARE about their wounded (not the case in Somalia)
2: you are falling back or gaining slowly so enemy has time to evac wounded.

If you're advancing rapidly like the US in Iraq, then all those casualties need to be cared for by the US, slowing down US forces.
  
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.