[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

Well the way reviews goes...they makr base don comparing it to the old game. GTA SA added alot more than Halo 2 has going by reviews. Halo 2 seems a lot more rehashed than GTA SA is. And hell you can do everything you do in Halo in gTA and more so. It has almost everything in it, which other game sonly do one or two of them.

Gta:sa added stuff that was basically pointless to the game, eating food? working out? wtf. That kinda shit you find in an rpg game, seems to me like they were running out of ideas and threw some shit in.

As for rehashed, lets see, drive car shoot people blow shit up, thats the gta formula down to a t. Id go as far to say the storyline in halo is a lot better and more important to the game and this is a fps whre storys dont usually matter much. Thing about gta is you dont even have to play the game, i know plenty of people that have gta games and they basically just drive around shooting shit up, halo sp made me want to play to the end to see what happened, gta:vc it was just like a game designed for fucking around in and didn't make me want to progress the story.

When iut comes to multiplayer, graphics (they matter dont even think about starting) and sound halo 2 has gta over a barrel on all counts, sp i would say the story in halo is better, and playing through the game in co-op mode (something gta doesn;t have) in the first game was fun as shit and will be the same in the second game.