Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Colonel
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Madmartagen
yeah, that has nothing to do with anything, considering clinton was out of office a good 2 years before our military was in iraq. oOo:
|
Have you ever sold the governement anthing? Do you realize how long it is from approval for an expenditure and when the thing that they bought actually goes into service? Especially on tanks, vehicles, planes, etc. |
if that was the case, then bush should have waited until the army had the supplies before he sent in the troops. if the clinton military was so underfunded, then it wouldnt have been able to knockout the taliban and iraqi govt. lack of armor and equiptment was only noticeable until after the occupation began and when bush introduced his first military budget. |
special forces knocked out the taliban w/ a little help from the northern alliance, clinton did cut military spending quite a bit , and he was also really soft on terrorism ( didnt really make any effort to go after OBL , even after 2 embassies were destroyed and other terrorist acts were committed).
04-16-2005, 11:19 PM
Threaded Mode