|
|
Brigadier General
Posts: 10,721
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: C-eH-N-eH-D-eH eH?
|

03-25-2006, 02:42 PM
They need fodder, you will be accepted.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 5,158
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Gatineau, Qc, Canada
|

03-25-2006, 03:10 PM
Man... I'd be fucking pissed to get anything under 95, to be completely honest with ya.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 2,049
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
|

03-25-2006, 03:11 PM
how many of you ahve even taken it?
added poll
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major
Posts: 6,938
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Behind You...
|

03-25-2006, 03:22 PM
i was a sophomore i think back then, i would like to take them again if that its possible just to see if i my score would be better, because i think it would be. i forget what was even on the test, but i know back then i didnt know jack shit about mechanics or that kinda stuff and i do no so i think i could do a lot better now.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Colonel
Posts: 8,177
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, New York
|

03-25-2006, 03:59 PM
ive taken a few practice asvabs when i had recruiters over my house. Did pretty well they told me
|
|
|
 |
|
|
General of the Army
Posts: 18,844
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: AA.com North Building, Offtopic Floor, Apartment 1337
|

03-25-2006, 04:50 PM
[quote="Simo Häyhä":c240c]ive taken a few practice asvabs when i had recruiters over my house. Did pretty well they told me[/quote:c240c]they were really at your house to bum ya mudda though right? ed: happy: calmdown: beer: the_finger: spank:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major
Posts: 6,413
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: University of Guelph
|

03-25-2006, 04:59 PM
If its all math I would do terrible.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 1,505
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Good Ol' Nor'east
|

03-25-2006, 06:26 PM
i got a 99 biggrin: lowest over all the subjects was a 97
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 2,769
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia
|

03-25-2006, 06:29 PM
So it's some sort of intelligence test for the military?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Colonel
Posts: 8,177
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ontario, New York
|

03-25-2006, 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by c312
So it's some sort of intelligence test for the military?
|
helps determine your MOS i believe
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 185
Join Date: Mar 2006
|

03-25-2006, 06:53 PM
[quote="Simo Häyhä":9e1cc]
Quote:
Originally Posted by c312
So it's some sort of intelligence test for the military?
|
helps determine your MOS i believe[/quote:9e1cc]
yeap
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

03-25-2006, 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miscguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nyck
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miscguy
Jesus, 64, are you fucking retarded or something?
|
dude you only got a 72 so its not like you are some super fuckin genius.
http://www.groundforce1.com/forums/view ... lts#564079
ffs milla himmler zap and all them scored in like the high 50's
so die in a friendly fire accident
|
Never claimed to be a "super genius",and in that so graciously posted link i explain i suck at math. Though i did not know that only a 31 was needed for marines. If i recall right i think a 50 was required for the Army, and thusly a 64 isnt mind blowing by Army standards. Hell even my score was "average". Hense why my "average" of 72 would bring on a retarded comment.
|
I think he owned you.
Stil, I dont think you have any place to say "you're retarded" when you claim the only reason you got that low of a score was because of long division....wtf....seriously. Long division....and elementary math rolleyes:
|
|
|
 |
|
|
2nd Lieutenant
Posts: 3,811
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Redmond, Home of Microsoft
|

03-25-2006, 07:56 PM
When was the last time you did long division on paper? Dont forget all the remainder shit and all that. I didnt say long division was the only reason, i said it was something that i hadnt done in ages. Perhaps i should have gone into each indiviual math problem i had trouble with, but i didnt feel like breaking it down for you. I simply recalled having the most trouble with long division, the algebra was fairly easy since it was recent.
And frankly the only way im "owned" in this is if i had claimed i got a 297429729 and then he gives the thread. As is a 72 is still far better than his 64 when you look at the test and its grading.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 2,049
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wisconsin
|

03-25-2006, 08:00 PM
I would have done better but I wasn't taking my time, I was doing it fast, and for some questions as I clicked one answer and went to click enter to go to the next I realized I clicked the wrong answer but it was to late...
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Major General
Posts: 13,482
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: University Park, PA
|

03-25-2006, 08:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miscguy
When was the last time you did long division on paper? Dont forget all the remainder shit and all that. I didnt say long division was the only reason, i said it was something that i hadnt done in ages. Perhaps i should have gone into each indiviual math problem i had trouble with, but i didnt feel like breaking it down for you. I simply recalled having the most trouble with long division, the algebra was fairly easy since it was recent.
And frankly the only way im "owned" in this is if i had claimed i got a 297429729 and then he gives the thread. As is a 72 is still far better than his 64 when you look at the test and its grading.
|
lol long division....
|
|
|
 |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by ScriptzBin Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
© 1998 - 2007 by Rudedog Productions | All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. All rights reserved.
|