[elstatec]

Originally Posted by Pyro

well all i know is sony owns the console market because they ahve game sthat are actually good and don't just waste all their effort on "pretty" grpahics.

were not talking about games content, we are talking about graphics here.


and anyway without the gta series ps2 is nothing.

and anyway gg spellstein.

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Mr.Buttocks":ddbc6][quote=geRV]Made this last night in about an hour, playing recording bla bla, makes me wonder how real games are gonna look in a few years time

[url="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/vid/evolution.zip

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.mar ... lution.zip[/url]

Good stuff. What's the name of that piece of music?[/quote:ddbc6]

"Echoes" by heaven shall burn

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

well all i know is sony owns the console market because they ahve game sthat are actually good and don't just waste all their effort on "pretty" grpahics.

Sony cant really spend time on pretty graphics because compared to the xbox and gamecube the ps2 is very limited for graphics.

[Pyro]

Originally Posted by geRV

Sony cant really spend time on pretty graphics because compared to the xbox and gamecube the ps2 is very limited for graphics.

Graphics still don't make the game. If you want pretty visuals you can just go look outside.

[TonyMontana]

why did i even post that screenshot, sorry gerv rolleyes:

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

Graphics still don't make the game. If you want pretty visuals you can just go look outside.

Graphics may not make the game but they are more important than what they were 5 years ago, would you:

(a) want a game with doom 3 style graphics and great gameplay
(b) want a game with pong style graphics and great gameplay.

Obviously a is the way to go, gameplay may draw a player into the game but the first thing you see are the gaphics and if theyre bad even the most "playable" games could be offputting to some.

[Pyro]

hahah doom 3 + great gameplay doens't go together dude.

well if they can do both sure...but lets say i ahve one game with better than average game play, but average graphics...id take it over a game with better than average graphics with average gameplay

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

hahah doom 3 + great gameplay doens't go together dude.

well if they can do both sure...but lets say i ahve one game with better than average game play, but average graphics...id take it over a game with better than average graphics with average gameplay

Doom 3 is a matter of opinion like any game, listening to reviews is pretty pointless seeing as its one guy with his own opinion on a game.
Anyone can review a game and have an opinion of it, i dont see why places like gamespy and gamespot seem to think theyre any different from everyday gamers.

[elstatec]

Originally Posted by Pyro

hahah doom 3 + great gameplay doens't go together dude.

well if they can do both sure...but lets say i ahve one game with better than average game play, but average graphics...id take it over a game with better than average graphics with average gameplay

then why do you play tribes oOo:

[geRV]

Tribes\tribes2 and that new one... stupid:

Three games i could never get into.

[Jin-Roh]

Tribes was my first online FPS, I think. oOo:

[geRV]

[quote="Jin-Roh":f56a9]Tribes was my first online FPS, I think. oOo:[/quote:f56a9]

eek:

[Akuma]

Nice video.

wow we really evolved, eh? You shoulda added some Doom, and and Doom 2, and Wolf3D in there too :P

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Acideyez

wow we really evolved, eh? You shoulda added some Doom, and and Doom 2, and Wolf3D in there too :P

Would have but i was going more for the 3d accelerated games, software games usually come out lookin like shit when you try to record them.