[geRV]

[img]http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/Smilies/hbckeke2.gif[/img]

[img]http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gerald.marley/Smilies/kekesign.gif[/img]

[Brutal CarNage]

People are so gullible. Just post something people have very little understanding of and they are hooked like fish.[img]http://home.attbi.com/~ybhyper/Fish.gif[/img]

[Unknown_Sniper]

I for one would actually like to belive that we did land on the moon. And for those of you conspiracy theorists out there who think this is faked for the sole reason of the radiation belt well listen up.
1)If you like conspiracies then you belive the US government is covering up a UFO(remember this for later).
2) The US government has the most advanced Space program in the world now that the russians had to take out MIR evil:
3) The US government has control of a UFO
4) Advanced space program
5) UFO
6) SPACE PROGRAM
7) UFO
8) Get it yet? WE coppied some technology of the aliens that crashed a decade before the moon landing and beat the Russians biggrin:
But for us non conspiracy people than how about this. By next year Japan will have the worlds strongest optical Telescope pointed at teh moon. The are looking for the left behind remains of the moon landers

[Hollywood]

Oh man that was a good laugh. UFO!! I think we cleared up the whole Roswell thing, classified testing on parachutes or something like that. They used the UFO story to cover up what they were actually doing.

[Oddball]

Originally Posted by "Hollywood

This has nothing to do with a hatred for my country, this has to do with scientific facts. Do some research on the subject before you spout off incoherent babble like that. The only proof you have for defending the space program is that they have moon rocks?? Of course they do, they have had lunar landings on the moon plenty of times. How else would they know the conditions that the astronauts would face Besides, [i

do you know the difference from a moon rock and a chunk of hardened lava? Probably not, so how is that statement even credible[/i]? We are not arguing patriotism, we are mearly discussing the facts and scientific research that shows the moon landing was possibly faked to gain an edge over the Russians in their space program.

Well of course I wouldn't know but I bet 100% of the world's geologists would. If you don't believe that the findings are true then just about every single thing that you have never seen or heard about is false.

You ever been to Angkor Wat? I'm guessing not...so it mustn't exist. You ever seen Ulurru? I doubt it, it mustn't exist then. Didn't you personally witness the collapsing of the Twin Twoers or the plane running into the Pentagon? Don't think so. To deny that the moonlandings means that by your logic just about 99.9% of Human History that has ever occured never happened because the hard evidence isn't there. I'm also guessing you believe the Holocaust never existed right?

If so then how can you believe in on event occuring and denying another when both havepretty much the same amount of basic evidence.

BTW I ask you to fnd a piece of Earth and compare it to the moon and see how similar it is.[/i]

[Bleuachdu]

[quote="[DAS REICH] Blitz":161e9]how bout a few of these? ed: eek: ed: eek: ed: eek: ed: eek: ed: eek: ed: eek: ed: eek:[/quote:161e9]

[img]http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ddgarcia/gifs/spam.gif[/img]

[Hollywood]

Why do people not know how to use the quote button? oOo: Of course the moon is similar to Earth, it was once part of it. The fact is just do some research before you say that common cliche "just because you haven't seen it doesn't me it doesn't exist". It's a perfectly plausible theory, and is no reason to ram your beliefs down my throat.

[intrestedviewer]

I think at least one of the landings was BS. oOo:

[1080jibber]

its kind of hard to belive that they landed on the moon, when todays home computers are more powerfull than NASA's computers that put them on the moon back then oOo:

[pest]

Originally Posted by 1080jibber

its kind of hard to belive that they landed on the moon, when todays home computers are more powerfull than NASA's computers that put them on the moon back then oOo:

Its not like people were helpless before computers.

I for one believe that the landings took place. I have read the conspiracy theory "facts" and I have also read the rebuttals (unfortunately, not from NASA).

The question will be answered definatively soon enough anyway.

[Bazooka_Joe]

That was funny, heh

[Oddball]

One thing I don't get is if there was no moon landing how come the Parkes radiotelescope, which was the prime receiver for the moon landings, picked up the radio signals from the surface of the moon. Having your radiotelescope pointed at the moon and picking up TV signals from the surface of the moon sounds pretty convincing to me.

Also I'm pretty sure I sure astronauts hop into the rocket that got blasted to the moon.