[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

Who cares if they are different games. I can say which game is better. You know how much fucking work was put into KOTOR and Fable compared to Halo...

Bioware are fucking gods when they created KOTOR. Fable isn't as good as the development time made it seem like it would be, but it is by far the second best game on Xbox.

How the hell can you say which game is better if theyre not even in the same genre? Thats like saying intels pentiums are faster than nvidia's gfx cards ffs oOo: . Unless its the same genre comparrisons are pointless as theres no baseline for a comparrison.

[Machette]

Pyros constant blabbering usually never comes out clear... nag:

[Pyro]

so lets take god and generals...which is an FPs game which got like ratings like 1/10

I have no basis to say KOTOR is better just because the genre is different?

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

so lets take god and generals...which is an FPs game which got like ratings like 1/10

I have no basis to say KOTOR is better just because the genre is different?

You have no basis because they are different games. What if games reviewers started reviewing games and they gave fable a bad review because "it was't as good a fps as halflife2", its not meant to be an fps game so why would they even compare it to halflife. Same thing applies here. If games were reviewed\compared the way you're basically suggesting the whole system would be retarded and ass about face.

I dunno why you;re even trying to argue this, what next, compare soccer games to rpg's and complain about the soccer games lack of storyline or complain cause theres no football in the rpg? Different genres can NOT be compared and i dont care what you say to the contrary, comparing two completly different things is retarded.

[Pyro]

Originally Posted by geRV

You have no basis because they are different games. What if games reviewers started reviewing games and they gave fable a bad review because "it was't as good a fps as halflife2", its not meant to be an fps game so why would they even compare it to halflife. Same thing applies here. If games were reviewed\compared the way you're basically suggesting the whole system would be retarded and ass about face.

I dunno why you;re even trying to argue this, what next, compare soccer games to rpg's and complain about the soccer games lack of storyline or complain cause theres no football in the rpg? Different genres can NOT be compared and i dont care what you say to the contrary, comparing two completly different things is retarded.

In terms of genres, Halo is not close to the best FPS game, and Fable is also not close to being the best RPG.

Chrono Trigger > you

[ninty]

I agree with gerv. So there.

[geRV]

Originally Posted by Pyro

In terms of genres, Halo is not close to the best FPS game, and Fable is also not close to being the best RPG.

Chrono Trigger > you

Best fps game as voted by games players is halflife. As for halo it has a place in the top 10 imo.

[Pyro]

I don't see why Halflife is #1 besides the fact that people believe it is revolutionary. The SP is boring as fuck imo.

[strvs]

Originally Posted by Pyro

I don't see why Halflife is #1 besides the fact that people believe it is revolutionary. The SP is boring as fuck imo.

Just shut the fuck up already.

Same old shit, every fuckin post.

[geRV]

It brought new stuff into the game, other characters you interacted with and were meant to care about, the storyline was nothing special, was basically an enhanced version of doom but from what ive read the game experience from start to finish is good. I have it but have never played it through. Might have to one of these days, preferably before hl2 comes out, so ive about 5 years of time. eek:

[Coleman]

[quote="@/\/G3L":83000]his mom and blow up woman.[/quote:83000]...enough with the stupid "your mom" jokes. That was such a 5th grade phad, it's not even funny.