[Jimmy Paterson]

I do think we will be at war with china within the next 10 years or so

[Madmartagen]

aa.com vs china, who would win?

[Arkan]

I've been saying this for the past couple of years.....i'm more concerned with whats going on in the Asian countries (N. Korea & China) than anything else. I predict some sort of major problem in the very near future with them.

[Milla]

Originally Posted by Arkan

I've been saying this for the past couple of years.....i'm more concerned with whats going on in the Asian countries (N. Korea & China) than anything else. I predict some sort of major problem in the very near future with them.

I totally agree.

[Bleuachdu]

China has way too much riding on the success of our economy to attack us or try and start something. The amount of US dollars privately invested in China is ridiculous... they desperately need to keep that $ there.

[geRV]

America at war with china would be fun and games, all a bunch of dick waving "omg look at our noookes" bullshit.

2 countries yet probably most of the world would suffer from it. rolleyes:

[Judas]

Originally Posted by geRV

America at war with china would be fun and games, all a bunch of dick waving "omg look at our noookes" bullshit.

2 countries yet probably most of the world would suffer from it. rolleyes:

keep it up culchie... keep it up.


[img]http://images.fsenablers.com/recipe/661/shrimp_fork.jpg[/img]

[Coleman]

Originally Posted by geRV

America at war with china would be fun and games, all a bunch of dick waving "omg look at our noookes" bullshit.

2 countries yet probably most of the world would suffer from it. rolleyes:

i don't even think the rest of the world would be around to suffer from it

[Trunks]

China actually has the potential to be the most powerful nation, millitary wise in the world due to its enormous population. However, the troops are undisciplined, poorly trained, poorly armed, and poorly equiped. It would be like another Iraq war, except with a lot more people.

[ninty]

Strength lies in numbers. I think that still applies today. Especially with China.

[Trunks]

Originally Posted by ninty9

Strength lies in numbers. I think that still applies today. Especially with China.

not always true. Many brilliant commanders have been able to win battles with far less people. Better tactics, better discipline, and better technology, that is wat wins a battle.

[Bullitt]

▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓ ▓▓▓
▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓ ▒▒▓

[Mr.Buttocks]

[quote="Bullitt Tooth":2b99e]▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▓▓ ▒▒▓
▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▓▒▒▓▓ ▓▓▓
▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▒▒▓▓▓▒▒▓ ▒▒▓[/quote:2b99e]


spank:

[ninty]

Originally Posted by Trunks

not always true. Many brilliant commanders have been able to win battles with far less people. Better tactics, better discipline, and better technology, that is wat wins a battle.

Yes, I know. I'm talking in general. Put up 300-400 thousand US troops plus all their technology against 1 million Chinese in an urban environment and the US will lose every time I gurantee it. Infact, put all of NATO against the Chinese and we'd loose every time.

maybe if China could be as diciplned as the Japanese were in WW2, china would have a great army..